Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21489277›Full record

ArticleBehavioral and brain functions : BBF2011

Facial and semantic emotional interference: a pilot study on the behavioral and cortical responses to the Dual Valence Association Task.

Agustín Ibáñez, Esteban Hurtado, Rodrigo Riveros, Hugo Urquina, Juan F Cardona, Agustín Petroni, Alejandro Lobos-Infante, Joaquin Barutta, Sandra Baez, Facundo Manes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral and brain functions : BBF, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Empathy and contextual social cognition.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Agustín IbáñezInstitute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO), Favaloro University, Argentina. aibanez@neurologiacognitiva.org
Esteban Hurtado
Rodrigo Riveros
Hugo Urquina
Juan F Cardona
Agustín Petroni
Alejandro Lobos-Infante
Joaquin Barutta
Sandra Baez
Facundo Manes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegration of compatible or incompatible emotional valence and semantic information is an essential aspect of complex social interactions. A modified version of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) called Dual Valence Association Task (DVAT) was designed in order to measure conflict resolution processing from compatibility/incompatibly of semantic and facial valence. The DVAT involves two emotional valence evaluative tasks which elicits two forms of emotional compatible/incompatible associations (facial and semantic).

methodsBehavioural measures and Event Related Potentials were recorded while participants performed the DVAT.

resultsBehavioural data showed a robust effect that distinguished compatible/incompatible tasks. The effects of valence and contextual association (between facial and semantic stimuli) showed early discrimination in N170 of faces. The LPP component was modulated by the compatibility of the DVAT.

conclusionsResults suggest that DVAT is a robust paradigm for studying the emotional interference effect in the processing of simultaneous information from semantic and facial stimuli.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionSemanticsAdultCerebral CortexDiscrimination, PsychologicalEmotionsEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationPilot ProjectsPsychomotor PerformanceReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID21489277
PMCPMC3087672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.