ReviewEnvironmental health : a global access science source2011
The socioeconomic determinants of cancer.
Review in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of Pollution on Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Focus on Air Pollution.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Pooled it
- Social determinants of health and pediatric cancer survival: A systematic review.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2022Pooled it
- Gender-specific differences in care-seeking behaviour among lung cancer patients: a systematic review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Social determinants of prostate cancer in the Caribbean: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2018Pooled it
- Social determinants of breast cancer in the Caribbean: a systematic review.International journal for equity in health · 2017Pooled it
- Experiential Support Across Breast Cancer Care and Familial Breast Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment in Quebec, Canada: A Comparative Study of Accompanying Patients' Contributions.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic disparities in sarcoma diagnosis, expert center access, and advocacy group awareness: a multicenter study in Southern Europe.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Temporal Trends in Cancer Burden and 27 Subtypes Among Women of Childbearing Age Globally from 1990 to 2021.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Building the cancer research workforce through implementation of theDiscover education · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Epidemiological trends and projections of esophageal cancer in BRICS-plus: Based on the GBD 2021 database.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Retrospective analysis of pediatric patients with Burkitt lymphoma treated in Tanzania following the implementation of the 2016 National Treatment Guidelines: Poor outcomes to current standard-of-care therapy.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2024Article
- Socioeconomic and cultural factors associated with pap smear screening among French women living in Réunion Island.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Effects of gender and socio-environmental factors on health-care access in oncology: a comprehensive, nationwide study in France.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Association between Socioeconomic Factors and the Risk of Gastric Cancer Incidence: Results from an Ecological Study.Iranian journal of public health · 2023Article
- Spatial patterns and the associated factors for breast cancer hospitalization in the rural population of Fujian Province, China.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Dietary Fiber Intake and Related Factors in Community-Based Iranian's Elderly.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2023Article
- Social and racial inequalities in diabetes and cancer in the United States.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- The Effect of Dietary Methyl-Donor Intake and Other Lifestyle Factors on Cancer Patients in Hungary.Cancers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper provides a synthesis on socioeconomic inequalities in cancer incidence, mortality and survival across countries and within countries, with particular focus on the Italian context; the paper also describes the underlying mechanisms documented for cancer incidence, and reports some remarks on policies to tackle inequalities.From a worldwide perspective, the burden of cancer appears to be particularly increasing in developing countries, where many cancers with a poor prognosis (liver, stomach and oesophagus) are much more common than in richer countries. As in the case of incidence and mortality, also in cancer survival we observe a great variability across countries. Different studies have suggested a possible impact of health care on the social gradients in cancer survival, even in countries with a National Health System providing equitable access to care.In developed countries, there is increasing awareness of social inequalities as an important public health issue; as a consequence, there is a variety of strategies and policies being implemented throughout Europe. However, recent reviews emphasize that present knowledge on effectiveness of policies and interventions on health inequalities is not sufficient to offer a robust and evidence-based guide to the choice and design of interventions, and that more evaluation studies are needed.The large disparities in health that we can measure within and between countries represent a challenge to the world; social health inequalities are avoidable, and their reduction therefore represents an achievable goal and an ethical imperative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.