Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21489215›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2011

Molecular Epidemiology, prenatal exposure and prevention of cancer.

Frederica Perera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prenatal Fine Particulate Matter (PMInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The potential effect of gender in CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genotype-specific associations with pediatric brain tumor.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frederica PereraMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 100 Haven Avenue, Tower 3, #25F, New York, NY 10032, USA. fpp1@columbia.edu
Columbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular Epidemiology was originally conceived as a preventive approach, providing a valuable tool for investigating risk factors for cancer in vulnerable populations. Biomarkers can be used as early indicators of risk for preventative purposes and risk assessment. The present contribution mainly refers to in utero exposures to carcinogens, since humans are especially vulnerable during fetal development. Environmental exposures in utero can increase risks for both childhood and adult cancers; their interactions with genetic and nutritional susceptibility factors may further increase risk. Thus, the early developmental period represents an important window for cancer prevention.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureCarcinogens, EnvironmentalDNADNA DamageFemaleFetusGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMolecular EpidemiologyNeoplasmsPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsRisk FactorsCarcinogens, EnvironmentalDNA

Identifiers

PMID21489215
PMCPMC3073197
OpenAlexW2106506671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.