Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21488828›Full record

ReviewInfectious disorders drug targets2011

Hendra and nipah infection: pathology, models and potential therapies.

Frederic Vigant, Benhur Lee

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infectious disorders drug targets, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nipah virus: a summary for clinicians.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frederic VigantDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Benhur Lee
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Vaccines and Diagnostics TrialsU54AI065359 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BARBOUR, ALAN G. · 2005 to 2013
$88.8M
Broad spectrum therapeutics that target the viral membraneU01AI082100 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LEE, BENHUR · 2009 to 2012
$3.0M
Small Molecule Inhibitors of Nipah and Hendra Virus InfectionU01AI070495 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LEE, BENHUR · 2006 to 2009
$2.8M
Nipah Virus Pathobiology and Effects on Innate ImmunityR01AI060694 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BAUM, LINDA G · 2005 to 2009
$1.8M
Envelope-receptor interactions in Nipah and Hendra virus pathobiologyR01AI069317 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LEE, BENHUR · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI060694NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI069317NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI070495NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI082100NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI065359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Paramyxoviridae family comprises of several genera that contain emerging or re-emerging threats for human and animal health with no real specific effective treatment available. Hendra and Nipah virus are members of a newly identified genus of emerging paramyxoviruses, Henipavirus. Since their discovery in the 1990s, henipaviruses outbreaks have been associated with high economic and public health threat potential. When compared to other paramyxoviruses, henipaviruses appear to have unique characteristics. Henipaviruses are zoonotic paramyxoviruses with a broader tropism than most other paramyxoviruses, and can cause severe acute encephalitis with unique features among viral encephalitides. There are currently no approved effective prophylactic or therapeutic treatments for henipavirus infections. Although ribavirin was empirically used and seemed beneficial during the biggest outbreak caused by one of these viruses, the Nipah virus, its efficacy is disputed in light of its lack of efficacy in several animal models of henipavirus infection. Nevertheless, because of its highly pathogenic nature, much effort has been spent in developing anti-henipavirus therapeutics. In this review we describe the unique features of henipavirus infections and the different strategies and animal models that have been developed so far in order to identify and test potential drugs to prevent or treat henipavirus infections. Some of these components have the potential to be broad-spectrum antivirals as they target effectors of viral pathogenecity common to other viruses. We will focus on small molecules or biologics, rather than vaccine strategies, that have been developed as anti-henipaviral therapeutics.

Indexed as

Hendra VirusNipah VirusAnimalsAntiviral AgentsDisease Models, AnimalDisease OutbreaksEncephalitis, ViralHenipavirus InfectionsHumansAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID21488828
PMCPMC3253017
OpenAlexW1975597078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.