ReviewJournal of long-term effects of medical implants2010
Novel approaches to bone grafting: porosity, bone morphogenetic proteins, stem cells, and the periosteum.
Review in Journal of long-term effects of medical implants, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical Technique for Management of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Clavicle.Arthroscopy techniques · 2024Article
- Management of a Persistent Radicular Cyst in the Maxillary Right Lateral Incisor: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- The Uniform Distribution of Hydroxyapatite in a Polyurethane Foam-Based Scaffold (PU/HAp) to Enhance Bone Repair in a Calvarial Defect Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Effect of Porcine- and Bovine-Derived Xenografts with Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose for Bone Formation in Rabbit Calvaria Defects.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Influence of a novel scaffold composed of polyurethane, hydroxyapatite, and decellularized bone particles on the healing of fourth metacarpal defects in mares.Veterinary surgery : VS · 2021Article
- Development and physicochemical characterization of novel porous phosphate glass bone graft substitute and in vitro comparison with xenograft.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2021Article
- Collagenated Porcine Heterologous Bone Grafts: Histomorphometric Evaluation of Bone Formation Using Different Physical Forms in a Rabbit Cancellous Bone Model.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Split Calvarial Grafting for Closure of Large Cranial Defects: The Ideal Option?Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2019Article
- Periosteum derived stem cells for regenerative medicine proposals: Boosting current knowledge.World journal of stem cells · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The disadvantages involving the use of a patient's own bone as graft material have led surgeons to search for alternative materials. In this review, several characteristics of a successful bone graft material are discussed. In addition, novel synthetic materials and natural bone graft materials are being considered. Various factors can determine the success of a bone graft substitute. For example, design considerations such as porosity, pore shape, and interconnection play significant roles in determining graft performance. The effective delivery of bone morphogenetic proteins and the ability to restore vascularization also play significant roles in determining the success of a bone graft material. Among current approaches, shorter bone morphogenetic protein sequences, more efficient delivery methods, and periosteal graft supplements have shown significant promise for use in autograft substitutes or autograft extenders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.