Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21488763›Full record

Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2011

Intervention to reduce transmission of resistant bacteria in intensive care.

W Charles Huskins, Charmaine M Huckabee, Naomi P O'Grady, Patrick Murray, Heather Kopetskie, Louise Zimmer, Mary Ellen Walker, Ronda L Sinkowitz-Cochran, John A Jernigan, Matthew Samore and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 133 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
27.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00100386 nacompletednot on this map

Strategies to Reduce Transmission of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria in Intensive Care Units (STAR*ICU) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Ran2005 to 2006Enrolled30,000ConditionsBacterial DiseasesArmsIntensive Control Strategy, Standard Control Strategy
NCT03268122 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Standard Isolation With Targeted Isolation for Preventing Nosocomial Transmission of MRSA and VRE: A Pilot Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorVanderbilt University Medical CenterRan2017 to 2018Enrolled1,974ConditionsMRSA, VRE InfectionArmsStandard Contact Isolation, Targeted Contact Isolation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 386 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Modelling methicillin-resistantJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Impact of stopping contact precautions onAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

W Charles HuskinsDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Charmaine M Huckabee
Naomi P O'Grady
Patrick Murray
Heather Kopetskie
Louise Zimmer
Mary Ellen Walker
Ronda L Sinkowitz-Cochran
John A Jernigan
Matthew Samore
Dennis Wallace
Donald A Goldmann
STAR*ICU Trial Investigators
Rho (United States) · USNational Center for Infectious Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USMayo Clinic · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USVA Salt Lake City Healthcare System · US

Funding

MAYO CLINIC CENTER FOR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE ACTIVITIESUL1RR024150 · NCRR · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RIZZA, ROBERT A. · 2006 to 2011
$66.4M
ZESTRIL VS. VERAPAMIL IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSIONM01RR000585 · NCRR · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RIZZA, ROBERT A. · 1985 to 2006
$30.4M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR025008 · NCRR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2007 to 2011
$29.0M
Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
X LINKED NYSTAGMUS SYNDROME WITH FEATURES OF ALBINISMM01RR000039 · NCRR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI VACCARINO, VIOLA · 1985 to 2007
$21.3M
Strategies to Reduce Transmission of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria in ICUsZIACL008080 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI O'GRADY, NAOMI P · 2009 to 2012
$0k
Bacteriology and Mycology Study Group /BAMSG/-26615440N01AI015440 · NIAID · BAMSG · 2002 to 2004
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000039NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR-00039NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000585NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR-00585NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024150NCRR NIH HHS UL1-RR024150NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025008NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI015440NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI015441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive care units (ICUs) are high-risk settings for the transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE).

methodsIn a cluster-randomized trial, we evaluated the effect of surveillance for MRSA and VRE colonization and of the expanded use of barrier precautions (intervention) as compared with existing practice (control) on the incidence of MRSA or VRE colonization or infection in adult ICUs. Surveillance cultures were obtained from patients in all participating ICUs; the results were reported only to ICUs assigned to the intervention. In intervention ICUs, patients who were colonized or infected with MRSA or VRE were assigned to care with contact precautions; all the other patients were assigned to care with universal gloving until their discharge or until surveillance cultures obtained at admission were reported to be negative.

resultsDuring a 6-month intervention period, there were 5434 admissions to 10 intervention ICUs, and 3705 admissions to 8 control ICUs. Patients who were colonized or infected with MRSA or VRE were assigned to barrier precautions more frequently in intervention ICUs than in control ICUs (a median of 92% of ICU days with either contact precautions or universal gloving [51% with contact precautions and 43% with universal gloving] in intervention ICUs vs. a median of 38% of ICU days with contact precautions in control ICUs, P<0.001). In intervention ICUs, health care providers used clean gloves, gowns, and hand hygiene less frequently than required for contacts with patients assigned to barrier precautions; when contact precautions were specified, gloves were used for a median of 82% of contacts, gowns for 77% of contacts, and hand hygiene after 69% of contacts, and when universal gloving was specified, gloves were used for a median of 72% of contacts and hand hygiene after 62% of contacts. The mean (±SE) ICU-level incidence of events of colonization or infection with MRSA or VRE per 1000 patient-days at risk, adjusted for baseline incidence, did not differ significantly between the intervention and control ICUs (40.4±3.3 and 35.6±3.7 in the two groups, respectively; P=0.35).

conclusionsThe intervention was not effective in reducing the transmission of MRSA or VRE, although the use of barrier precautions by providers was less than what was required. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; STAR*ICU ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00100386.).

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusVancomycin ResistanceAnti-Bacterial AgentsColony Count, MicrobialCross InfectionDisease Transmission, InfectiousEnterococcusGloves, ProtectiveGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHand DisinfectionHumansInfection ControlPatient IsolationStaphylococcal InfectionsSurgical AttireAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID21488763
PMCPMC3410743
OpenAlexW2104697905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.