Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2011
Intervention to reduce transmission of resistant bacteria in intensive care.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 133 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Strategies to Reduce Transmission of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria in Intensive Care Units (STAR*ICU) Trial
Comparison of Standard Isolation With Targeted Isolation for Preventing Nosocomial Transmission of MRSA and VRE: A Pilot Clinical Trial
Who cites it
133 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 386 citations in OpenAlex.
- Approaches to multidrug-resistant organism prevention and control in long-term care facilities for older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2022Pooled it
- Gloves, gowns and masks for reducing the transmission of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the hospital setting.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Under-reporting of venous and arterial thrombotic events in randomized clinical trials: a meta-analysis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2015Pooled it
- epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England.The Journal of hospital infection · 2014Guideline
- Trends and significance of VRE colonization in the ICU: a meta-analysis of published studies.PloS one · 2013Pooled it
- Active surveillance testing to reduce transmission of carbapenem-resistant, gram-negative bacteria in intensive care units: a pragmatic, randomized cross-over trial.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2023Trial
- Modelling methicillin-resistantJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Trial
- Effect of chlorhexidine bathing and other infection control practices on the Benefits of Universal Glove and Gown (BUGG) trial: a subgroup analysis.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2015Trial
- Cost savings of universal decolonization to prevent intensive care unit infection: implications of the REDUCE MRSA trial.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2014Trial
- Trial
- Interventions to reduce colonisation and transmission of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in intensive care units: an interrupted time series study and cluster randomised trial.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2014Trial
- Impact of contact isolation for multidrug-resistant organisms on the occurrence of medical errors and adverse events.Intensive care medicine · 2013Trial
- Trial
- Do active surveillance and contact precautions reduce MRSA acquisition? A prospective interrupted time series.PloS one · 2013Trial
- Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients admitted to adult intensive care units: the STAR*ICU trial.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2011Trial
- Screening Strategies to Control Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria: An Agent-Based Model.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Risk-Based Isolation Strategy for MDR-Endemic Facilities with Limited Resources.Infectious disease reports · 2026Review
- Impact of stopping contact precautions onAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
- Impact of COVID-19 isolation measures on ICU microbial resistance dynamics: simulation-based statistical modeling analysis.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Article
- Infection prevention and control without borders: comparison of guidelines on multidrug-resistant organisms in the northern Dutch-German cross-border region.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Article
73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntensive care units (ICUs) are high-risk settings for the transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE).
methodsIn a cluster-randomized trial, we evaluated the effect of surveillance for MRSA and VRE colonization and of the expanded use of barrier precautions (intervention) as compared with existing practice (control) on the incidence of MRSA or VRE colonization or infection in adult ICUs. Surveillance cultures were obtained from patients in all participating ICUs; the results were reported only to ICUs assigned to the intervention. In intervention ICUs, patients who were colonized or infected with MRSA or VRE were assigned to care with contact precautions; all the other patients were assigned to care with universal gloving until their discharge or until surveillance cultures obtained at admission were reported to be negative.
resultsDuring a 6-month intervention period, there were 5434 admissions to 10 intervention ICUs, and 3705 admissions to 8 control ICUs. Patients who were colonized or infected with MRSA or VRE were assigned to barrier precautions more frequently in intervention ICUs than in control ICUs (a median of 92% of ICU days with either contact precautions or universal gloving [51% with contact precautions and 43% with universal gloving] in intervention ICUs vs. a median of 38% of ICU days with contact precautions in control ICUs, P<0.001). In intervention ICUs, health care providers used clean gloves, gowns, and hand hygiene less frequently than required for contacts with patients assigned to barrier precautions; when contact precautions were specified, gloves were used for a median of 82% of contacts, gowns for 77% of contacts, and hand hygiene after 69% of contacts, and when universal gloving was specified, gloves were used for a median of 72% of contacts and hand hygiene after 62% of contacts. The mean (±SE) ICU-level incidence of events of colonization or infection with MRSA or VRE per 1000 patient-days at risk, adjusted for baseline incidence, did not differ significantly between the intervention and control ICUs (40.4±3.3 and 35.6±3.7 in the two groups, respectively; P=0.35).
conclusionsThe intervention was not effective in reducing the transmission of MRSA or VRE, although the use of barrier precautions by providers was less than what was required. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; STAR*ICU ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00100386.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.