Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21487440›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2011

Multiplex ligation-depending probe amplification is not suitable for detection of low-grade mosaicism.

Monique M van Veghel-Plandsoen, Cokkie H Wouters, Joan N R Kromosoeto, Mariska C den Ridder-Klünnen, Dicky J J Halley, Ans M W van den Ouweland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Detection ofBiomedicines · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Unrevealed mosaicism in the next-generation sequencing era.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2016
    Review
  13. Decoding NF1 Intragenic Copy-Number Variations.American journal of human genetics · 2015
    Article
  14. "Down syndrome: an insight of the disease".Journal of biomedical science · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Monique M van Veghel-PlandsoenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.plandsoen@erasmusmc.nl
Cokkie H Wouters
Joan N R Kromosoeto
Mariska C den Ridder-Klünnen
Dicky J J Halley
Ans M W van den Ouweland

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

'Apparent non-penetrance' occurs in several genetic disorders, including tuberous sclerosis complex and neurofibromatosis type 1: clinically unaffected parents may have multiple affected offspring. Germ line or somatic mosaicism in one of the parents of the index patient is the probable cause and results in an enhanced recurrence risk. Therefore, it is of great importance to use the most sensitive technology for testing DNA of the parents of the index patient for the presence/absence of the familial mutation. To detect large rearrangements multiplex ligation-depending probe amplification (MLPA) is often used. Here we show that MLPA is less sensitive in detecting low-grade somatic mosaicism than fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or a mutation-specific PCR test. Therefore, we recommend FISH (if possible) or PCR analysis for the analysis of parental DNA.

Indexed as

MosaicismParentsPenetranceGerm CellsHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceNeurofibromatosis 1Nucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityTuberous Sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID21487440
PMCPMC3179360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.