Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21487402›Full record

ReviewMolecular systems biology2011

Social interaction in synthetic and natural microbial communities.

Joao B Xavier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular systems biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. A metagenomics approach to investigate microbiome sociobiology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Increased Intraspecies Diversity inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  17. Cross-level sociodemographic homogeneity alters individual risk for completed suicide.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Capsule ProtectsFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joao B XavierProgram in Computational Biology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY 10065, USA. XavierJ@mskcc.org

Funding

Variability of Cellular Responses to Growth Factors and Drugs During TumorgenesisU54CA148967 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI ALTAN-BONNET, GREGOIRE · 2010 to 2014
$13.8M
NCI NIH HHS 1U54CA148967-01NCI NIH HHS U54 CA148967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social interaction among cells is essential for multicellular complexity. But how do molecular networks within individual cells confer the ability to interact? And how do those same networks evolve from the evolutionary conflict between individual- and population-level interests? Recent studies have dissected social interaction at the molecular level by analyzing both synthetic and natural microbial populations. These studies shed new light on the role of population structure for the evolution of cooperative interactions and revealed novel molecular mechanisms that stabilize cooperation among cells. New understanding of populations is changing our view of microbial processes, such as pathogenesis and antibiotic resistance, and suggests new ways to fight infection by exploiting social interaction. The study of social interaction is also challenging established paradigms in cancer evolution and immune system dynamics. Finding similar patterns in such diverse systems suggests that the same 'social interaction motifs' may be general to many cell populations.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEcosystemMicrobial InteractionsGene Expression RegulationImmune SystemModels, BiologicalNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID21487402
PMCPMC3101950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.