ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2011
Data standards for clinical research data collection forms: current status and challenges.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Tumor Treatment Through Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Modeling: A Comprehensive Review.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Two new clinical diagnostic models for Talaromycosis marneffei in AIDS patients within 48 h: evaluation of performance and comparison with previous models.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Data capture, collection, management, and storage systems for clinical research: A scoping review protocol.PloS one · 2026Article
- Rapid development of a registry to accelerate COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- How to Design Electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) Questions to Maximize Semantic Interoperability in Clinical Research.Interactive journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Applications of Machine Learning (ML) and Mathematical Modeling (MM) in Healthcare with Special Focus on Cancer Prognosis and Anticancer Therapy: Current Status and Challenges.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- FAIRification of health-related data using semantic web technologies in the Swiss Personalized Health Network.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Article
- Composite CDE: modeling composite relationships between common data elements for representing complex clinical data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Clinical MetaData ontology: a simple classification scheme for data elements of clinical data based on semantics.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
- QLBMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
- Data sharing platforms for de-identified data from human clinical trials.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2018Article
- Achieving Milestones as a Prerequisite for Proceeding With a Clinical Trial.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2018Article
- Improving the Patient-Clinician Interface of Clinical Trials through Health Informatics Technologies.Journal of medical systems · 2018Review
- National Neuroinformatics Framework for Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA).Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2018Article
- Clinical Concept Value Sets and Interoperability in Health Data Analytics.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018Article
- EsPRit: ethics committee proposals for Long Term Medical Data Registries in rapidly evolving research fields - a future-proof best practice approach.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Article
- Towards achieving semantic interoperability of clinical study data with FHIR.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2017Article
- Development of a Pediatric Adverse Events Terminology.Pediatrics · 2017Article
- An exploratory study using an openEHR 2-level modeling approach to represent common data elements.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Case report forms (CRFs) are used for structured-data collection in clinical research studies. Existing CRF-related standards encompass structural features of forms and data items, content standards, and specifications for using terminologies. This paper reviews existing standards and discusses their current limitations. Because clinical research is highly protocol-specific, forms-development processes are more easily standardized than is CRF content. Tools that support retrieval and reuse of existing items will enable standards adoption in clinical research applications. Such tools will depend upon formal relationships between items and terminological standards. Future standards adoption will depend upon standardized approaches for bridging generic structural standards and domain-specific content standards. Clinical research informatics can help define tools requirements in terms of workflow support for research activities, reconcile the perspectives of varied clinical research stakeholders, and coordinate standards efforts toward interoperability across healthcare and research data collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.