Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21486881›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2011

Rank-based spatial clustering: an algorithm for rapid outbreak detection.

Jialan Que, Fu-Chiang Tsui

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jialan QueDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. jiq4@pitt.edu
Fu-Chiang Tsui

Funding

Improving Detection of Outbreaks Due to Aerosol AttacksR01PH000026 · PH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HOGAN, WILLIAM R · 2005 to 2007
$1.2M
PHITPO CDC HHS 1U38HK000063-01PHITPO CDC HHS U38 HK000063PHPPO CDC HHS 1 R01 PH00026-01PHPPO CDC HHS R01 PH000026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePublic health surveillance requires outbreak detection algorithms with computational efficiency sufficient to handle the increasing volume of disease surveillance data. In response to this need, the authors propose a spatial clustering algorithm, rank-based spatial clustering (RSC), that detects rapidly infectious but non-contagious disease outbreaks.

designThe authors compared the outbreak-detection performance of RSC with that of three well established algorithms-the wavelet anomaly detector (WAD), the spatial scan statistic (KSS), and the Bayesian spatial scan statistic (BSS)-using real disease surveillance data on to which they superimposed simulated disease outbreaks. MEASUREMENTS: The following outbreak-detection performance metrics were measured: receiver operating characteristic curve, activity monitoring operating curve curve, cluster positive predictive value, cluster sensitivity, and algorithm run time.

resultsRSC was computationally efficient. It outperformed the other two spatial algorithms in terms of detection timeliness, and outbreak localization. RSC also had overall better timeliness than the time-series algorithm WAD at low false alarm rates.

conclusionRSC is an ideal algorithm for analyzing large datasets when the application of other spatial algorithms is not practical. It also allows timely investigation for public health practitioners by providing early detection and well-localized outbreak clusters.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSpace-Time ClusteringComputer SimulationDisease OutbreaksHumansPennsylvaniaPopulation SurveillanceSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID21486881
PMCPMC3078668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.