Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21486768›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2011

Olfactory receptor neuron responses coding for rapid odour sampling.

Ambarish S Ghatpande, Johannes Reisert

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The CaThe Journal of physiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Coupling of Mouse Olfactory Bulb Projection Neurons to Fluctuating Odor Pulses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Adaptive temporal processing of odor stimuli.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A primacy code for odor identity.Nature communications · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cilia- and Flagella-Associated Protein 69 Regulates Olfactory Transduction Kinetics in Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  19. Cyclic-nucleotide-gated cation current and Ca2+-activated Cl current elicited by odorant in vertebrate olfactory receptor neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ambarish S GhatpandeMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Johannes Reisert
Monell Chemical Senses Center · US

Funding

Dynamic Aspects of Olfactory Signal TransductionR01DC009613 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI REISERT, JOHANNES · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC009613NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) are stimulated in a rhythmic manner in vivo, driven by delivery of odorants to the nasal cavity carried by the inhaled air, making olfaction a sense where animals can control the frequency of stimulus delivery. How ORNs encode repeated stimulation at resting, low breathing frequencies and at increased sniffing frequencies is not known, nor is it known if the olfactory transduction cascade is accurate and fast enough to follow high frequency stimulation. We investigated mouse olfactory responses to stimulus frequencies mimicking odorant exposure during low (2Hz) and high (5Hz) frequency sniffing. ORNs reliably follow low frequency stimulations with high fidelity by generating bursts of action potentials at each stimulation at intermediate odorant concentrations, but fail to do so at high odorant concentrations. Higher stimulus frequencies across all odorant concentrations reduced the likelihood of action potential generation, increased the latency of response, and decreased there liability of encoding the onset of stimulation. Thus an increase in stimulus frequency degrades and at high odorant concentrations entirely prevents action potential generation in individual ORNs, causing reduced signalling to the olfactory bulb. These results demonstrate that ORNs do not simply relay timing and concentration of an odorous stimulus, but also process and modulate the stimulus in a frequency-dependent manner which is controlled by the chosen sniffing rate.

Indexed as

OdorantsRespiratory RateSignal TransductionSmellAction PotentialsAnimalsElectric StimulationGreen Fluorescent ProteinsInhalation ExposureMiceMice, 129 StrainMice, TransgenicNasal MucosaNeural PathwaysOlfactory NerveReaction TimeGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21486768
PMCPMC3098702
OpenAlexW2130771168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.