Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21486635›Full record

ReviewThe Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice2011

Intestinal microbiota of dogs and cats: a bigger world than we thought.

Jan S Suchodolski

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. An Ecological Framework for Interpreting the Canine Gut Microbiome.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Identification of botulism C/D in 2 dogsThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation of extended-spectrumFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Recent Advances in the Nutrition and Metabolism of Dogs and Cats.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Characteristics of the Digestive Tract of Dogs and Cats.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan S SuchodolskiDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Gastrointestinal Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843‑4474, USA. jsuchodolski@cvm.tamu.edu
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbes play a crucial role in the regulation of host health, but the true complexity of the gastrointestinal microbiota has been underestimated using traditional culture techniques. Recent molecular-phylogenetic and metagenomic studies have revealed a highly diverse microbial community in the canine and feline gastrointestinal tract of healthy animals, consisting of bacteria, archaea, fungi, protozoa, and viruses. Alterations in microbial communities have also been reported in dogs and cats with chronic enteropathies, notably increases in Proteobacteria and depletions of Firmicutes. This review summarizes the current information about the intestinal microbial ecosystem in dogs and cats.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaBacterial Typing TechniquesCatsDogsGastrointestinal TractPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID21486635
PMCPMC7132526
OpenAlexW2137583743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.