Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21484604›Full record

ReviewSexual plant reproduction2011

Epigenetic control of cell specification during female gametogenesis.

Alma Armenta-Medina, Edgar Demesa-Arévalo, Jean-Philippe Vielle-Calzada

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sexual plant reproduction, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The female gametophyte.The arabidopsis book · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alma Armenta-MedinaGrupo de Desarrollo Reproductivo y Apomixis, Laboratorio Nacional de Genómica para la Biodiversidad y Departamento de Ingeniería Genética de Plantas, CINVESTAV, Irapuato, Mexico.
Edgar Demesa-Arévalo
Jean-Philippe Vielle-Calzada

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In flowering plants, the formation of gametes depends on the differentiation of cellular precursors that divide meiotically before giving rise to a multicellular gametophyte. The establishment of this gametophytic phase presents an opportunity for natural selection to act on the haploid plant genome by means of epigenetic mechanisms that ensure a tight regulation of plant reproductive development. Despite this early acting selective pressure, there are numerous examples of naturally occurring developmental alternatives that suggest a flexible regulatory control of cell specification and subsequent gamete formation in flowering plants. In this review, we discuss recent findings indicating that epigenetic mechanisms related to the activity of small RNA pathways prevailing during ovule formation play an essential role in cell specification and genome integrity. We also compare these findings to small RNA pathways acting during gametogenesis in animals and discuss their implications for the understanding of the mechanisms that control the establishment of the female gametophytic lineage during both sexual reproduction and apomixis.

Indexed as

Gametogenesis, PlantGene SilencingGene Expression Regulation, PlantMagnoliopsidaOvulePlant ProteinsReproductionPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21484604
OpenAlexW2108290235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.