ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2011
Quantitative imaging of 124I and 86Y with PET.
Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tellurium-118 as a novel radionuclide for long-term positron emission tomography.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning-assisted event classification in cadmium zinc telluride positron emission tomography detectors leveraging entanglement-informed angular correlations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Targeting of Head and Neck Cancer by Radioiodinated CLR1404 in Murine Xenograft Tumor Models with Partial Volume Corrected Theranostic Dosimetry.Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals · 2023Article
- Simultaneous quantitative imaging of two PET radiotracers via the detection of positron-electron annihilation and prompt gamma emissions.Nature biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- An Overview of In Vitro Assays ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Theranostics with photodynamic therapy for personalized medicine: to see and to treat.Theranostics · 2023Review
- Efficiency ofEJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Positron Emission Intensity in the Decay ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Implications of physics, chemistry and biology for dosimetry calculations using theranostic pairs.Theranostics · 2022Review
- Beyond the MAA-Y90 Paradigm: The Evolution of Radioembolization Dosimetry Approaches and Scout Particles.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2021Review
- Optimizing reconstruction parameters for quantitativeEJNMMI physics · 2021Article
- Review
- Multimodal Imaging Technology Effectively Monitors HER2 Expression in Tumors Using Trastuzumab-Coupled Organic Nanoparticles in Patient-Derived Xenograft Mice Models.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Application Analysis ofInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2021Article
- Quantitative Whole-Body Imaging of I-124-Labeled Adeno-Associated Viral Vector Biodistribution in Nonhuman Primates.Human gene therapy · 2020Article
- Non-invasive Reporter Gene Imaging of Cell Therapies, including T Cells and Stem Cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2020Review
- Cerenkov luminescence and PET imaging ofPhysics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- EANM Dosimetry Committee series on standard operational procedures for internal dosimetry forEJNMMI physics · 2020Article
- Monte Carlo Simulations of the GE Signa PET/MR for Different Radioisotopes.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Preclinical Characterization ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quantitative accuracy and image quality of positron emission tomography (PET) measurements with (124)I and (86)Y is affected by the prompt emission of gamma radiation and positrons in their decays, as well as the higher energy of the emitted positrons compared to those emitted by (18)F. PET scanners cannot distinguish between true coincidences, involving two 511-keV annihilation photons, and coincidences involving one annihilation photon and a prompt gamma, if the energy of this prompt gamma is within the energy window of the scanner. The current review deals with a number of aspects of the challenge this poses for quantitative PET imaging. First, the effect of prompt gamma coincidences on quantitative accuracy of PET images is discussed and a number of suggested corrections are described. Then, the effect of prompt gamma coincidences and the increased singles count rates due to gamma radiation on the count rate performance of PET is addressed, as well as possible improvements based on modification of the scanner's energy windows. Finally, the effect of positron energy on spatial resolution and recovery is assessed. The methods presented in this overview aim to overcome the challenges associated with the decay characteristics of (124)I and (86)Y. Careful application of the presented correction methods can allow for quantitatively accurate images with improved image contrast.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.