Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21484381›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2011

Matched pairs dosimetry: 124I/131I metaiodobenzylguanidine and 124I/131I and 86Y/90Y antibodies.

Egesta Lopci, Arturo Chiti, Maria Rita Castellani, Giovanna Pepe, Lidija Antunovic, Stefano Fanti, Emilio Bombardieri

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Molecular pharmaceutics · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Matched pairs for radionuclide-based imaging and therapy.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Egesta LopciPoliclinico S.Orsola-Malpighi and University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Arturo Chiti
Maria Rita Castellani
Giovanna Pepe
Lidija Antunovic
Stefano Fanti
Emilio Bombardieri
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITHumanitas University · ITPoliclinico S.Orsola-Malpighi · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The technological advances in imaging and production of radiopharmaceuticals are driving an innovative way of evaluating the targets for antineoplastic therapies. Besides the use of imaging to better delineate the volume of external beam radiation therapy in oncology, modern imaging techniques are able to identify targets for highly specific medical therapies, using chemotherapeutic drugs and antiangiogenesis molecules. Moreover, radionuclide imaging is able to select targets for radionuclide therapy and to give the way to in vivo dose calculation to target tissues and to critical organs. This contribution reports the main studies published on matched pairs dosimetry with (124)I/(131)I- and (86)Y/(90)Y-labelled radiopharmaceuticals, with an emphasis on metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) and monoclonal antibodies.

Indexed as

3-IodobenzylguanidineAntibodies, MonoclonalDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansIodine RadioisotopesNeoplasmsPositron-Emission TomographyRadiation DosageRadioimmunotherapyRadiometryRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiotherapy DosageTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonYttrium Radioisotopes3-IodobenzylguanidineAntibodies, MonoclonalIodine RadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsYttrium Radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID21484381
OpenAlexW2021990783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.