ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2011
Mechanical means to improve bone strength: ultrasound and vibration.
Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Applications of Biophysical Stimuli Technologies for Bone Healing.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Low-Intensity Continuous Ultrasound Therapies—A Systematic Review of Current State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Microbubble-Mediated Ultrasound Outweighs Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Osteogenesis and Neovascularization in a Rabbit Model of Steroid-Associated Osteonecrosis.BioMed research international · 2018Article
- Tibia shaft fractures: costly burden of nonunions.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Not all fractures heal well. One method that has been used to improve fracture healing is low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS). LIPUS has been US Food and Drug Administration approved for several years, and some preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that fracture healing can be improved by this technique, which appears to be generally safe. There are several suggested mechanisms of action of LIPUS. Clinical studies generally support its usefulness in accelerating fracture healing. A less-established modality is whole body vibration (WBV), which appears to stimulate bone and muscle growth while suppressing adipogenesis in animal studies. Early studies in humans, including some in children with disabilities, suggest that WBV holds promise as a technique for reducing fracture risk. The exact place of WBV in preventing fracture remains to be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.