Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21484186›Full record

ArticleJournal of cell communication and signaling2011

CCN2: a bona fide target for anti-fibrotic drug intervention.

Andrew Leask

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cell communication and signaling, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cutaneous wound healing: recruiting developmental pathways for regeneration.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2013
    Review
  5. Eureka! Ets a target for fibrosis!Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2011
    Article
  6. CCN2/decorin interactions: a novel approach to combating fibrosis?Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew LeaskDepartments of Dentistry and Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, N6A 5C1, Andrew.leask@schulich.uwo.ca.
Western University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CCN2 (formerly known as connective tissue growth factor) was identified by several different laboratories approximately 20 years ago. Almost since its identification as a factor induced in normal fibroblasts by transforming growth factor β and overexpressed in fibrotic disease, CCN2 has been hypothesized to be not only a marker but also a central mediator of fibrosis in vivo. Finally, in vivo data are emerging to validate this key hypothesis. For example, a neutralizing anti-CCN2 antibody was found to attenuate fibrogenesis in three separate animal models (Wang et al. in Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair 4:1-4, 2011). This commentary addresses recent data indicating that CCN2 appears to represent a key central mediator of fibrosis and a good target for anti-fibrotic drug intervention.

Identifiers

PMID21484186
PMCPMC3088789
OpenAlexW1991109477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.