ArticlePloS one2011
Genome-wide footprints of pig domestication and selection revealed through massive parallel sequencing of pooled DNA.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive transcriptomics comparison reveals switch of gene networks in the brain during silkworm domestication.Insect science · 2026Article
- Parallel and convergent evolution in genes underlying seasonal migration.Evolution letters · 2025Article
- A comparison of wild boar and domestic pig microbiota does not reveal a loss of microbial species but an increase in alpha diversity and opportunistic genera in domestic pigs.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Population genetics reveals new introgression in the nucleus herd of min pigs.Genes & genomics · 2024Review
- Deciphering climate resilience in Indian cattle breeds by selection signature analyses.Tropical animal health and production · 2024Article
- Population Genetic Analysis of Six Chinese Indigenous Pig Meta-Populations Based on Geographically Isolated Regions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- A comparative investigation on H3K27ac enhancer activities in the brain and liver tissues between wild boars and domesticated pigs.Evolutionary applications · 2022Article
- Genomic signatures of artificial selection in fecundity of Pacific white shrimp,Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Detecting the differential genomic variants using cross-population phenotype-associated variant (XP-PAV) of the Landrace and Yorkshire pigs in Korea.Animal cells and systems · 2021Article
- A Mix of Old British and Modern European Breeds: Genomic Prediction of Breed Composition of Smallholder Pigs in Uganda.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Tracing selection signatures in the pig genome gives evidence for selective pressures on a unique curly hair phenotype in Mangalitza.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Selective sweep analysis reveals extensive parallel selection traits between large white and Duroc pigs.Evolutionary applications · 2020Article
- Transcriptomic comparison of communally reared wild, domesticated and hybrid Atlantic salmon fry under stress and control conditions.BMC genetics · 2020Article
- Selection signatures in tropical cattle are enriched for promoter and coding regions and reveal missense mutations in the damage response gene HELB.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2020Article
- Assessing breed integrity of Göttingen Minipigs.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Article
- Changed Patterns of Genomic Variation Following Recent Domestication: Selection Sweeps in Farmed Atlantic Salmon.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Genomic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and selection signatures in European local pig breeds assessed with a high density SNP chip.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Comparing genomic signatures of domestication in two Atlantic salmon (Evolutionary applications · 2019Article
- In silico approaches to discover the functional impact of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms in selective sweep regions of the Landrace genome.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2018Article
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial selection has caused rapid evolution in domesticated species. The identification of selection footprints across domesticated genomes can contribute to uncover the genetic basis of phenotypic diversity. METHODOLOGY/MAIN
findingsGenome wide footprints of pig domestication and selection were identified using massive parallel sequencing of pooled reduced representation libraries (RRL) representing ∼2% of the genome from wild boar and four domestic pig breeds (Large White, Landrace, Duroc and Pietrain) which have been under strong selection for muscle development, growth, behavior and coat color. Using specifically developed statistical methods that account for DNA pooling, low mean sequencing depth, and sequencing errors, we provide genome-wide estimates of nucleotide diversity and genetic differentiation in pig. Widespread signals suggestive of positive and balancing selection were found and the strongest signals were observed in Pietrain, one of the breeds most intensively selected for muscle development. Most signals were population-specific but affected genomic regions which harbored genes for common biological categories including coat color, brain development, muscle development, growth, metabolism, olfaction and immunity. Genetic differentiation in regions harboring genes related to muscle development and growth was higher between breeds than between a given breed and the wild boar. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results, suggest that although domesticated breeds have experienced similar selective pressures, selection has acted upon different genes. This might reflect the multiple domestication events of European breeds or could be the result of subsequent introgression of Asian alleles. Overall, it was estimated that approximately 7% of the porcine genome has been affected by selection events. This study illustrates that the massive parallel sequencing of genomic pools is a cost-effective approach to identify footprints of selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.