Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21483667›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Genome-wide analysis of the binding of the Hox protein Ultrabithorax and the Hox cofactor Homothorax in Drosophila.

Siew Woh Choo, Robert White, Steven Russell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Micromanagement ofJournal of developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  5. Roles ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  6. Developmental Robustness: The Haltere Case inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Control of tissue morphogenesis by the HOX geneDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Engineering the Drosophila Genome for Developmental Biology.Journal of developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mechanisms of Specificity for Hox Factor Activity.Journal of developmental biology · 2016
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Siew Woh ChooDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Robert White
Steven Russell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hox genes encode a family of transcription factors that are key developmental regulators with a highly conserved role in specifying segmental diversity along the metazoan body axis. Although they have been shown to regulate a wide variety of downstream processes, direct transcriptional targets have been difficult to identify and this has been a major obstacle to our understanding of Hox gene function. We report the identification of genome-wide binding sites for the Hox protein Ultrabithorax (Ubx) using a YFP-tagged Drosophila protein-trap line together with chromatin immunoprecipitation and microarray analysis. We identify 1,147 genes bound by Ubx at high confidence in chromatin from the haltere imaginal disc, a prominent site of Ubx function where it specifies haltere versus wing development. The functional relevance of these genes is supported by their overlap with genes differentially expressed between wing and haltere imaginal discs. The Ubx-bound gene set is highly enriched in genes involved in developmental processes and contains both high-level regulators as well as genes involved in more basic cellular functions. Several signalling pathways are highly enriched in the Ubx target gene set and our analysis supports the view that Hox genes regulate many levels of developmental pathways and have targets distributed throughout the gene network. We also performed genome-wide analysis of the binding sites for the Hox cofactor Homothorax (Hth), revealing a striking similarity with the Ubx binding profile. We suggest that these binding profiles may be strongly influenced by chromatin accessibility and provide evidence of a link between Ubx/Hth binding and chromatin state at genes regulated by Polycomb silencing. Overall, we define a set of direct Ubx targets in the haltere imaginal disc and suggest that chromatin accessibility has important implications for Hox target selection and for transcription factor binding in general.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene SilencingGenes, InsectGenomicsHomeodomain ProteinsOrgan SpecificityPolycomb Repressive Complex 1Protein BindingTime FactorsTranscription FactorsChromatinDrosophila ProteinsHomeodomain Proteinshth protein, DrosophilaPc protein, DrosophilaPolycomb Repressive Complex 1Transcription FactorsUbx protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID21483667
PMCPMC3071696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.