Trial reportPloS one2011
Results of antiretroviral treatment interruption and intensification in advanced multi-drug resistant HIV infection from the OPTIMA trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00050089 (CSP #512 - Options in Management With Anti-Retrovirals), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
CSP #512 - Options in Management With Anti-Retrovirals (OPTIMA), Management of Patients With HIV Infection for Whom First and Second-line Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy Has Failed
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Estimating HIV Management and Comorbidity Costs Among Aging HIV Patients in the United States: A Systematic Review.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2020Pooled it
- A joint frailty model provides for risk stratification of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients based on unobserved heterogeneity.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Analysis of the Impact of Antiretroviral Drug Changes on Survival of Patients with Advanced-Stage AIDS with Multidrug-Resistant HIV Infection.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CareTrial
- Combining spironolactone to antiretroviral therapy accelerates HIV decay in humanized mice.Emerging microbes & infections · 2025Article
- A Qualitative Scoping Review of Early-Terminated Clinical Trials Sponsored by the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program From 2010 to 2020.Epidemiologic reviews · 2022Article
- Distribution-Weighted Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using Lifetime Health Loss.PharmacoEconomics · 2017Article
- Cost-effectiveness of newer antiretroviral drugs in treatment-experienced patients with multidrug-resistant HIV disease.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2013Article
- Mapping MOS-HIV to HUI3 and EQ-5D-3L in Patients With HIV.MDM policy & practiceArticle
- A joint model for recurrent events and a semi-competing risk in the presence of multi-level clustering.Statistical methods in medical researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGuidance is needed on best medical management for advanced HIV disease with multidrug resistance (MDR) and limited retreatment options. We assessed two novel antiretroviral (ARV) treatment approaches in this setting. METHODS AND
findingsWe conducted a 2×2 factorial randomized open label controlled trial in patients with a CD4 count≤300 cells/µl who had ARV treatment (ART) failure requiring retreatment, to two options (a) re-treatment with either standard (≤4 ARVs) or intensive (≥5 ARVs) ART and b) either treatment starting immediately or after a 12-week monitored ART interruption. Primary outcome was time to developing a first AIDS-defining event (ADE) or death from any cause. Analysis was by intention to treat. From 2001 to 2006, 368 patients were randomized. At baseline, mean age was 48 years, 2% were women, median CD4 count was 106/µl, mean viral load was 4.74 log(10) copies/ml, and 59% had a prior AIDS diagnosis. Median follow-up was 4.0 years in 1249 person-years of observation. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary composite outcome of ADE or death between re-treatment options of standard versus intensive ART (hazard ratio 1.17; CI 0.86-1.59), or between immediate retreatment initiation versus interruption before re-treatment (hazard ratio 0.93; CI 0.68-1.30), or in the rate of non-HIV associated serious adverse events between re-treatment options.
conclusionsWe did not observe clinical benefit or harm assessed by the primary outcome in this largest and longest trial exploring both ART interruption and intensification in advanced MDR HIV infection with poor retreatment options.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00050089.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.