Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21483491›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2011

Results of antiretroviral treatment interruption and intensification in advanced multi-drug resistant HIV infection from the OPTIMA trial.

Mark Holodniy, Sheldon T Brown, D William Cameron, Tassos C Kyriakides, Brian Angus, Abdel Babiker, Joel Singer, Douglas K Owens, Aslam Anis, Ruth Goodall and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00050089 (CSP #512 - Options in Management With Anti-Retrovirals), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00050089 nacompletednot on this map

CSP #512 - Options in Management With Anti-Retrovirals (OPTIMA), Management of Patients With HIV Infection for Whom First and Second-line Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy Has Failed

TypeinterventionalSponsorUS Department of Veterans AffairsRan2001 to 2007Enrolled368ConditionsAIDS, HIV InfectionsArmsNo Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (No ARDFP) vs ARDFP, Standard ART vs Mega ART
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Mark HolodniyVA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Sheldon T Brown
D William Cameron
Tassos C Kyriakides
Brian Angus
Abdel Babiker
Joel Singer
Douglas K Owens
Aslam Anis
Ruth Goodall
Fleur Hudson
Mirek Piaseczny
John Russo
Martin Schechter
Lawrence Deyton
Janet Darbyshire
OPTIMA Team

Funding

CIHRMedical Research Council MC_U122886352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidance is needed on best medical management for advanced HIV disease with multidrug resistance (MDR) and limited retreatment options. We assessed two novel antiretroviral (ARV) treatment approaches in this setting. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a 2×2 factorial randomized open label controlled trial in patients with a CD4 count≤300 cells/µl who had ARV treatment (ART) failure requiring retreatment, to two options (a) re-treatment with either standard (≤4 ARVs) or intensive (≥5 ARVs) ART and b) either treatment starting immediately or after a 12-week monitored ART interruption. Primary outcome was time to developing a first AIDS-defining event (ADE) or death from any cause. Analysis was by intention to treat. From 2001 to 2006, 368 patients were randomized. At baseline, mean age was 48 years, 2% were women, median CD4 count was 106/µl, mean viral load was 4.74 log(10) copies/ml, and 59% had a prior AIDS diagnosis. Median follow-up was 4.0 years in 1249 person-years of observation. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary composite outcome of ADE or death between re-treatment options of standard versus intensive ART (hazard ratio 1.17; CI 0.86-1.59), or between immediate retreatment initiation versus interruption before re-treatment (hazard ratio 0.93; CI 0.68-1.30), or in the rate of non-HIV associated serious adverse events between re-treatment options.

conclusionsWe did not observe clinical benefit or harm assessed by the primary outcome in this largest and longest trial exploring both ART interruption and intensification in advanced MDR HIV infection with poor retreatment options.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00050089.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsDrug Resistance, Multiple, ViralFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID21483491
PMCPMC3069000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.