ArticlePLoS computational biology2011
CAERUS: predicting CAncER oUtcomeS using relationship between protein structural information, protein networks, gene expression data, and mutation data.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Survey of Tools and Software for Active Subnetwork Identification.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- The Emerging Potential for Network Analysis to Inform Precision Cancer Medicine.Journal of molecular biology · 2018Review
- Advances in computational approaches for prioritizing driver mutations and significantly mutated genes in cancer genomes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2016Review
- Article
- CARDIO-PRED: an in silico tool for predicting cardiovascular-disorder associated proteins.Systems and synthetic biology · 2015Article
- A systems biology strategy to identify molecular mechanisms of action and protein indicators of traumatic brain injury.Journal of neuroscience research · 2015Article
- Mono-isotope Prediction for Mass Spectra Using Bayes Network.Tsinghua science and technology · 2014Article
- Elucidating the genotype-phenotype relationships and network perturbations of human shared and specific disease genes from an evolutionary perspective.Genome biology and evolution · 2014Article
- Predicting cancer prognosis using functional genomics data sets.Cancer informatics · 2014Review
- Proteomic approaches in biomarker discovery: new perspectives in cancer diagnostics.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2014Review
- Structural bioinformatics of the interactome.Annual review of biophysics · 2014Review
- Integrative approaches for finding modular structure in biological networks.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2013Review
- Using protein interaction database and support vector machines to improve gene signatures for prediction of breast cancer recurrence.Journal of medical signals and sensors · 2013Article
- A network module-based method for identifying cancer prognostic signatures.Genome biology · 2012Article
- Reproducible quantification of cancer-associated proteins in body fluids using targeted proteomics.Science translational medicine · 2012Article
- Integration of proteomics into systems biology of cancer.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carcinogenesis is a complex process with multiple genetic and environmental factors contributing to the development of one or more tumors. Understanding the underlying mechanism of this process and identifying related markers to assess the outcome of this process would lead to more directed treatment and thus significantly reduce the mortality rate of cancers. Recently, molecular diagnostics and prognostics based on the identification of patterns within gene expression profiles in the context of protein interaction networks were reported. However, the predictive performances of these approaches were limited. In this study we propose a novel integrated approach, named CAERUS, for the identification of gene signatures to predict cancer outcomes based on the domain interaction network in human proteome. We first developed a model to score each protein by quantifying the domain connections to its interacting partners and the somatic mutations present in the domain. We then defined proteins as gene signatures if their scores were above a preset threshold. Next, for each gene signature, we quantified the correlation of the expression levels between this gene signature and its neighboring proteins. The results of the quantification in each patient were then used to predict cancer outcome by a modified naïve Bayes classifier. In this study we achieved a favorable accuracy of 88.3%, sensitivity of 87.2%, and specificity of 88.9% on a set of well-documented gene expression profiles of 253 consecutive breast cancer patients with different outcomes. We also compiled a list of cancer-associated gene signatures and domains, which provided testable hypotheses for further experimental investigation. Our approach proved successful on different independent breast cancer data sets as well as an ovarian cancer data set. This study constitutes the first predictive method to classify cancer outcomes based on the relationship between the domain organization and protein network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.