Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21482810›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

Quantifying structure and performance diversity for sets of small molecules comprising small-molecule screening collections.

Paul A Clemons, J Anthony Wilson, Vlado Dančík, Sandrine Muller, Hyman A Carrinski, Bridget K Wagner, Angela N Koehler, Stuart L Schreiber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paul A ClemonsBroad Institute of Harvard and MIT, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA. pclemons@broadinstitute.org
J Anthony Wilson
Vlado Dančík
Sandrine Muller
Hyman A Carrinski
Bridget K Wagner
Angela N Koehler
Stuart L Schreiber

Funding

The Incubator ProjectP50GM069721 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SCHREIBER, STUART L · 2003 to 2012
$21.3M
General data-analysis tools to relate chemical diversityP20HG003895 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CLEMONS, PAUL ANDREW · 2005 to 2007
$1.1M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS N01 CO012400NCI NIH HHS N01-CO-12400NHGRI NIH HHS P20 HG003895NHGRI NIH HHS P20-HG003895NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM069721NIGMS NIH HHS P50-GM069721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a diverse collection of small molecules we recently found that compound sets from different sources (commercial; academic; natural) have different protein-binding behaviors, and these behaviors correlate with trends in stereochemical complexity for these compound sets. These results lend insight into structural features that synthetic chemists might target when synthesizing screening collections for biological discovery. We report extensive characterization of structural properties and diversity of biological performance for these compounds and expand comparative analyses to include physicochemical properties and three-dimensional shapes of predicted conformers. The results highlight additional similarities and differences between the sets, but also the dependence of such comparisons on the choice of molecular descriptors. Using a protein-binding dataset, we introduce an information-theoretic measure to assess diversity of performance with a constraint on specificity. Rather than relying on finding individual active compounds, this measure allows rational judgment of compound subsets as groups. We also apply this measure to publicly available data from ChemBank for the same compound sets across a diverse group of functional assays. We find that performance diversity of compound sets is relatively stable across a range of property values as judged by this measure, both in protein-binding studies and functional assays. Because building screening collections with improved performance depends on efficient use of synthetic organic chemistry resources, these studies illustrate an important quantitative framework to help prioritize choices made in building such collections.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualModels, ChemicalDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalMolecular StructureStructure-Activity Relationship

Identifiers

PMID21482810
PMCPMC3084049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.