Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21482682›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2011

Immunization with Bacillus spores expressing toxin A peptide repeats protects against infection with Clostridium difficile strains producing toxins A and B.

Patima Permpoonpattana, Huynh A Hong, Jutarop Phetcharaburanin, Jen-Min Huang, Jenny Cook, Neil F Fairweather, Simon M Cutting

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Vaccines · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Pivotal role ofFrontiers in medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Immunization Strategies Against Clostridioides difficile.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  9. Host Immune Responses toTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. The Bacterial Spore as a Mucosal Vaccine Delivery System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Major pathogenicIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patima PermpoonpattanaSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX United Kingdom.
Huynh A Hong
Jutarop Phetcharaburanin
Jen-Min Huang
Jenny Cook
Neil F Fairweather
Simon M Cutting
Royal Holloway University of London · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clostridium difficile is a leading cause of nosocomial infection in the developed world. Two toxins, A and B, produced by most strains of C. difficile are implicated as virulence factors, yet only recently has the requirement of these for infection been investigated by genetic manipulation. Current vaccine strategies are focused mostly on parenteral delivery of toxoids. In this work, we have used bacterial spores (Bacillus subtilis) as a delivery vehicle to evaluate the carboxy-terminal repeat domains of toxins A and B as protective antigens. Our findings are important and show that oral immunization of the repeat domain of toxin A is sufficient to confer protection in a hamster model of infection designed to closely mimic the human course of infection. Importantly, neutralizing antibodies to the toxin A repeat domain were shown to be cross-reactive with the analogous domain of toxin B and, being of high avidity, provided protection against challenge with a C. difficile strain producing toxins A and B (A(+)B(+)). Thus, although many strains produce both toxins, antibodies to only toxin A can mediate protection. Animals vaccinated with recombinant spores were fully able to survive reinfection, a property that is particularly important for a disease with which patients are prone to relapse. We show that mucosal immunization, not parenteral delivery, is required to generate secretory IgA and that production of these neutralizing polymeric antibodies correlates with protection. This work demonstrates that an effective vaccine against C. difficile can be designed around two attributes, mucosal delivery and the repeat domain of toxin A.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsBacterial VaccinesClostridioides difficileCricetinaeCross ProtectionEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousEnterotoxinsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleMesocricetusMiceMice, Inbred BALB CAntibodies, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsBacterial VaccinesEnterotoxinstcdA protein, Clostridium difficiletoxB protein, Clostridium difficileVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID21482682
PMCPMC3125831
OpenAlexW2159345390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.