Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21482624›Full record

ArticleGenome research2011

Origin of amphibian and avian chromosomes by fission, fusion, and retention of ancestral chromosomes.

Stephen R Voss, D Kevin Kump, Srikrishna Putta, Nathan Pauly, Anna Reynolds, Rema J Henry, Saritha Basa, John A Walker, Jeramiah J Smith

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Science advances · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Gene and transgenics nomenclature for the laboratory axolotl-Ambystoma mexicanum.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2022
    Article
  8. Microchromosomes are building blocks of bird, reptile, and mammal chromosomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Sex chromosome evolution among amniotes: is the origin of sex chromosomes non-random?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A database of amphibian karyotypes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen R VossDepartment of Biology and Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA. srvoss@uky.edu
D Kevin Kump
Srikrishna Putta
Nathan Pauly
Anna Reynolds
Rema J Henry
Saritha Basa
John A Walker
Jeramiah J Smith
University of Kentucky · USVirginia Mason Medical Center · US

Funding

GENOME RESOURCES FOR MODEL AMPHIBIANSR24RR016344 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI VOSS, STEPHEN RANDAL · 2002 to 2011
$3.5M
NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR016344NCRR NIH HHS R24-RR016344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amphibian genomes differ greatly in DNA content and chromosome size, morphology, and number. Investigations of this diversity are needed to identify mechanisms that have shaped the evolution of vertebrate genomes. We used comparative mapping to investigate the organization of genes in the Mexican axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum), a species that presents relatively few chromosomes (n = 14) and a gigantic genome (>20 pg/N). We show extensive conservation of synteny between Ambystoma, chicken, and human, and a positive correlation between the length of conserved segments and genome size. Ambystoma segments are estimated to be four to 51 times longer than homologous human and chicken segments. Strikingly, genes demarking the structures of 28 chicken chromosomes are ordered among linkage groups defining the Ambystoma genome, and we show that these same chromosomal segments are also conserved in a distantly related anuran amphibian (Xenopus tropicalis). Using linkage relationships from the amphibian maps, we predict that three chicken chromosomes originated by fusion, nine to 14 originated by fission, and 12-17 evolved directly from ancestral tetrapod chromosomes. We further show that some ancestral segments were fused prior to the divergence of salamanders and anurans, while others fused independently and randomly as chromosome numbers were reduced in lineages leading to Ambystoma and Xenopus. The maintenance of gene order relationships between chromosomal segments that have greatly expanded and contracted in salamander and chicken genomes, respectively, suggests selection to maintain synteny relationships and/or extremely low rates of chromosomal rearrangement. Overall, the results demonstrate the value of data from diverse, amphibian genomes in studies of vertebrate genome evolution.

Indexed as

AmbystomaAmphibiansAnimalsBirdsChickensChromosome MappingChromosomesEvolution, MolecularGenetic LinkageHumansXenopus

Identifiers

PMID21482624
PMCPMC3149497
OpenAlexW1970092595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.