Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21482101›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2011

Evolution and disorder.

Celeste J Brown, Audra K Johnson, A Keith Dunker, Gary W Daughdrill

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 177 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
177citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

177 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Identification and Expression Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evolution of a fuzzy ribonucleoprotein complex in viral assembly.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

117 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Celeste J BrownDepartment of Biological Sciences, IBEST, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-3051, United States. celesteb@uidaho.edu
Audra K Johnson
A Keith Dunker
Gary W Daughdrill

Funding

The Evolution of Protein FlexibilityP20RR016448 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI FORNEY, LARRY J · 2002 to 2011
$19.3M
Bioinformatics linkage of protein disorder and functionR01LM007688 · NLM · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI DUNKER, ALAN KEITH · 2003 to 2006
$1.3M
Mining the Structural Genomics Initiative for DisorderR01GM071714 · NIGMS · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI DUNKER, ALAN KEITH · 2006 to 2009
$1.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016448NCRR NIH HHS P20RR16448NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071714NLM NIH HHS R01 LM007688NLM NIH HHS R01LM007688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of disordered proteins or regions of proteins differs from that of ordered proteins because of the differences in their sequence composition, intramolecular contacts, and function. Recent assessments of disordered protein evolution at the sequence, structural, and functional levels support this hypothesis. Disordered proteins have a different pattern of accepted point mutations, exhibit higher rates of insertions and deletions, and generally, but not always, evolve more rapidly than ordered proteins. Even with these high rates of sequence evolution, a few examples have shown that disordered proteins maintain their flexibility under physiological conditions, and it is hypothesized that they maintain specific structural ensembles.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularProtein ConformationAnimalsCatalytic DomainHumansPoint MutationProtein BindingProtein FoldingProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID21482101
PMCPMC3112239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.