Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21481281›Full record

SynthesisBMC medicine2011

Risk of infection in patients with lymphoma receiving rituximab: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Simone Lanini, Aoife C Molloy, Paul E Fine, Archibald G Prentice, Giuseppe Ippolito, Christopher C Kibbler

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Rituximab in idiopathic membranous nephropathy.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2012
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Managing Invasive Fungal Infections During Allogeneic Hematopoietic Transplantation: A 2025 Update.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors in Primary Breast Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Considerations for the Treatment of Inflammatory Neuro-Ophthalmologic Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Simone LaniniNational Institute for Infectious Diseases, INMI-Lazzaro Spallanzani Via Portuense, 292 00149 Rome, Italy. simone.lanini@inmi.it
Aoife C Molloy
Paul E Fine
Archibald G Prentice
Giuseppe Ippolito
Christopher C Kibbler
Istituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive Lazzaro Spallanzani · ITThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe addition of Rituximab (R) to standard chemotherapy (C) has been reported to improve the end of treatment outcome in patients affected by CD-20 positive malignant lymphomas (CD20+ ML). Nevertheless, given the profound and prolonged immunosuppression produced by R there are concerns that severe infections may arise. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine whether or not the addition of R to C may increase the risk of severe infections in adults undergoing induction therapy for CD20+ ML.

methodsOnly randomised controlled trials comparing R-C to C standard alone in adult patients with CD20+ ML were included. Meta-analysis was performed on overall incidence of severe infection, risk of dying as the consequence of infection, risk of febrile neutropenia, risk of severe leucopenia, risk of severe granulocytopenia and overall response assuming a fixed effect model. Heterogeneity was investigated, if present and I2 >20%, according to several predefined baseline characteristics of the study populations.

resultsSeveral relevant results have emerged. First, the addition of R to standard C does not increase the overall risk of severe infections (RR = 1.00; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.14) nor does it increase the risk of dying as a consequence of infection (RR = 1.60; 95% CI 0.68 to 3.75). Second, we confirmed that the addition of R to standard C increases the proportion of overall response (RR = 1.12; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.15), but it also increases the risk of severe leucopenia (RR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.37) and granulocytopenia (RR = 1.07; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.12).

conclusionsR-C is superior to standard C in terms of overall response and it does not increase the overall incidence of severe infection. However, data on special groups of patients (for example, HIV positive subjects and HBV carriers) are lacking. In our opinion more studies are needed to explore the potential effect of R on silent and chronic viral infections.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic AgentsCommunicable DiseasesDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansImmunocompromised HostImmunologic FactorsIncidenceLymphomaMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRituximabAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic AgentsImmunologic FactorsRituximab

Identifiers

PMID21481281
PMCPMC3094236
OpenAlexW1975736815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.