ArticleDer Nervenarzt2011
[Is there evidence that depression screening benefits patients with medical illness?: not yet].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression is increasingly recognized as a common and disabling condition, and improving depression care has been prioritized by policy-makers in Germany and elsewhere. Screening for depression, which refers to the routine use of depression screening tools or sets of questions to identify patients who may have depression, but whose depression is otherwise not recognized by their physician, is one solution that has been proposed. However, there has never been a clinical trial that has found better depression outcomes for patients screened for depression compared to patients not screened when the same treatment and care resources are made available to both groups. There are, on the other hand, many negative trials that have failed to find benefit to patients from depression screening. Thus, depression screening has not been shown to benefit patients, may lead to important harm, and would consume a substantial amount of scarce resources. Prior to recommending that physicians routinely screen patients for depression, well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed that compare depression outcomes for patients screened versus patients not screened with the same treatment options available to both screened and non-screened patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21479739What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.