Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21479667›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2011

The experience of parents and children where children have been supported with a ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplantation.

Hollie Gilmore, Fiona Newall

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hollie GilmoreDepartment of Cardiology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. hollie.gilmore@rch.org.au
Fiona Newall
Royal Children's Hospital · AURoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is little information to assist in understanding the experience endured by parents and children where children have been supported with a ventricular assist device (VAD) as a bridge to heart transplantation. Consequently, the aims of this study were to gain an understanding of children's and parents' experience where children have been supported with a VAD as a bridge to heart transplantation and to use this information to improve the Royal Children's Hospital (RCH) VAD program. This study employed a qualitative approach using purposive sampling. Semistructured interviews were conducted with children aged 13 years or more and their parents to determine their experience of having required VAD support as a bridge to transplantation. Results demonstrated a lack of information that prepared families and children for the anticipated course of treatment on VAD support. Recommendations to improve the VAD program for parents and children include more information through meetings, as well as in a written format, and speaking to other families who had already experienced VAD. For children in particular, a visual of the VAD, its associated equipment, and an image of where it is placed in the body is vital information that is necessary prior to VAD support. Overall, the recommendations are important and should be made available to improve the experience for children and parents, not only of the RCH VAD program but for all hospitals offering VAD therapy.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesHeart TransplantationAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart FailureHumansMaleParentsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID21479667
OpenAlexW1983219240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.