Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21479525›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2012

Beyond palliative radiotherapy: a pilot multidisciplinary brain metastases clinic.

Brita Danielson, Alysa Fairchild

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Triage tools to inform the prioritisation of physical health services following a diagnosis of cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  2. Navigating the Complexities of Brain Metastases Management.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Symptom burden among Northern Alberta radiotherapy patients with advanced cancer: mapping needs and gaps.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  8. Enhancing Career Paths for Tomorrow's Radiation Oncologists.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparative multidisciplinary prediction of survival in patients with advanced cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Best supportive care in patients with brain metastases and adverse prognostic factors: development of improved decision aids.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Article
  17. Improving access to specialist multidisciplinary palliative care consultation for rural cancer patients by videoconferencing: report of a pilot project.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brita DanielsonDepartment of Oncology, University of Alberta Division on Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 1Z2. brita.danielson@albertahealthservices.ca
Alysa Fairchild

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of a multidisciplinary palliative radiotherapy clinic for patients with brain metastases.

methodsWe designed a 6-month pilot Rapid Access Palliative Radiotherapy Program (RAPRP) brain metastases clinic. The main goals of the clinic were: (1) to provide timely consultation and treatment, (2) to provide multidisciplinary assessment and care, (3) to facilitate accrual of patients to research studies, and (4) to be a positive experience for patients. Team members included a radiation oncologist, radiation therapist, nurse practitioner, social worker (SW), occupational therapist (OT), and registered dietitian (RD). Patients underwent multidimensional assessment with patient-reported questionnaires and completed a patient satisfaction survey. Data were collected in a prospective database and collated in a standardized fashion with descriptive statistics recorded as percentages, medians, and ranges.

resultsThe pilot brain metastases clinic ran weekly from August 5, 2009 to January 27, 2010. In total, 33 patients were seen. The median time from referral date to clinic date was 6 days, with 76% of patients seen within 1 week. Most patients (94%) started their radiotherapy on clinic day. Fifteen patients (45%) required assessment by a SW, 36% by an OT, and 33% by a RD. Ninety-one percent of patients participated in a research study. Eighty-six percent of patients reported being very satisfied with the clinic experience, and 97% would recommend the clinic to a patient in a similar situation.

conclusionsThe pilot RAPRP Brain Metastases Clinic was successful in providing patients with timely and multidisciplinary care and will continue beyond the pilot phase.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory Care FacilitiesBrain NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CarePatient Care TeamPatient SatisfactionPilot Projects

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.