Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21479520›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2012

High resolution imaging of tunnels by magnetic resonance neurography.

Ty K Subhawong, Kenneth C Wang, Shrey K Thawait, Eric H Williams, Shahreyar Shar Hashemi, Antonio J Machado, John A Carrino, Avneesh Chhabra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome - A Comprehensive Review.The Iowa orthopaedic journal · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. High resolution diffusion tensor imaging of human nerves in forearm.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ty K SubhawongThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 601 N. Caroline Street, Room 4214, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. tsubhaw1@jhmi.edu
Kenneth C Wang
Shrey K Thawait
Eric H Williams
Shahreyar Shar Hashemi
Antonio J Machado
John A Carrino
Avneesh Chhabra

Funding

Training for Clinician Scientists in Imaging ResearchT32EB006351 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI POMPER, MARTIN G · 2006 to 2022
$4.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS 1T32EB006351NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB006351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerves often traverse confined fibro-osseous and fibro-muscular tunnels in the extremities, where they are particularly vulnerable to entrapment and compressive neuropathy. This gives rise to various tunnel syndromes, characterized by distinct patterns of muscular weakness and sensory deficits. This article focuses on several upper and lower extremity tunnels, in which direct visualization of the normal and abnormal nerve in question is possible with high resolution 3T MR neurography (MRN). MRN can also serve as a useful adjunct to clinical and electrophysiologic exams by discriminating adhesive lesions (perineural scar) from compressive lesions (such as tumor, ganglion, hypertrophic callous, or anomalous muscles) responsible for symptoms, thereby guiding appropriate treatment.

Indexed as

AdolescentHumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNerve Compression SyndromesNeuroimagingPeripheral Nerve InjuriesPeripheral Nerves

Identifiers

PMID21479520
PMCPMC3158963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.