ArticlePloS one2011
Discriminating multi-species populations in biofilms with peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA FISH).
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 62 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated BSI bacteria identifier-on-chip using approximate k-mer matching.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Peptide Nucleic Acid-Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (PNA-FISH) for the Detection and Spatial Location of Microorganisms.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Low-Irradiance Antimicrobial Blue Light-Bathing Therapy for Wound Infection Control.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- An Antimicrobial Blue Light Prototype Device Controls Infected Wounds in a Preclinical Porcine Model.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Advancements in analytical methods for studying the human gut microbiome.Journal of biological methods · 2025Review
- Ecology ofBiofilm · 2024Review
- The Role of Flagellum and Flagellum-Based Motility onMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Interspecific interactions facilitate keystone species in a multispecies biofilm that promotes plant growth.The ISME journal · 2024Article
- Peptide nucleic acid conjugates and their antimicrobial applications-a mini-review.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2023Review
- Multichannel Microfluidic Platform for Temporal-Spatial Investigation of Niche Roles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli within a Dual-Species Biofilm.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Development of a Prevotella bivia PNA probe and a multiplex approach to detect three relevant species in bacterial vaginosis-associated biofilms.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2023Article
- Review
- Imaging biofilms using fluorescenceFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Review
- Bacteriocin Production byFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Exploiting the Anti-Biofilm Effect of the Engineered Phage Endolysin PM-477 to Disrupt In Vitro Single- and Dual-Species Biofilms of Vaginal Pathogens Associated with Bacterial Vaginosis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Finding the best combination of autochthonous microorganisms with the most effective biosorption ability for heavy metals removal from wastewater.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Architectural Features and Resistance to Food-Grade Disinfectants inFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Potential of Flow Cytometric Approaches for Rapid Microbial Detection and Characterization in the Food Industry-A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Single- and Dual-Species Biofilm Formation by Shiga Toxin-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2021Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOur current understanding of biofilms indicates that these structures are typically composed of many different microbial species. However, the lack of reliable techniques for the discrimination of each population has meant that studies focusing on multi-species biofilms are scarce and typically generate qualitative rather than quantitative data. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsWe employ peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA FISH) methods to quantify and visualize mixed biofilm populations. As a case study, we present the characterization of Salmonella enterica/Listeria monocytogenes/Escherichia coli single, dual and tri-species biofilms in seven different support materials. Ex-situ, we were able to monitor quantitatively the populations of ∼56 mixed species biofilms up to 48 h, regardless of the support material. In situ, a correct quantification remained more elusive, but a qualitative understanding of biofilm structure and composition is clearly possible by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) at least up to 192 h. Combining the data obtained from PNA FISH/CLSM with data from other established techniques and from calculated microbial parameters, we were able to develop a model for this tri-species biofilm. The higher growth rate and exopolymer production ability of E. coli probably led this microorganism to outcompete the other two [average cell numbers (cells/cm(2)) for 48 h biofilm: E. coli 2,1 × 10(8) (± 2,4 × 10(7)); L. monocytogenes 6,8 × 10(7) (± 9,4 × 10(6)); and S. enterica 1,4 × 10(6) (± 4,1 × 10(5))]. This overgrowth was confirmed by CSLM, with two well-defined layers being easily identified: the top one with E. coli, and the bottom one with mixed regions of L. monocytogenes and S. enterica. SIGNIFICANCE: While PNA FISH has been described previously for the qualitative study of biofilm populations, the present investigation demonstrates that it can also be used for the accurate quantification and spatial distribution of species in polymicrobial communities. Thus, it facilitates the understanding of interspecies interactions and how these are affected by changes in the surrounding environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.