Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21479268›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Discriminating multi-species populations in biofilms with peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA FISH).

Carina Almeida, Nuno F Azevedo, Sílvio Santos, Charles W Keevil, Maria J Vieira

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Low-Irradiance Antimicrobial Blue Light-Bathing Therapy for Wound Infection Control.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Ecology ofBiofilm · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Imaging biofilms using fluorescenceFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  15. Bacteriocin Production byFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carina AlmeidaInstitute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centre of Biological Engineering, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualta, Braga, Portugal.
Nuno F Azevedo
Sílvio Santos
Charles W Keevil
Maria J Vieira

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur current understanding of biofilms indicates that these structures are typically composed of many different microbial species. However, the lack of reliable techniques for the discrimination of each population has meant that studies focusing on multi-species biofilms are scarce and typically generate qualitative rather than quantitative data. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe employ peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA FISH) methods to quantify and visualize mixed biofilm populations. As a case study, we present the characterization of Salmonella enterica/Listeria monocytogenes/Escherichia coli single, dual and tri-species biofilms in seven different support materials. Ex-situ, we were able to monitor quantitatively the populations of ∼56 mixed species biofilms up to 48 h, regardless of the support material. In situ, a correct quantification remained more elusive, but a qualitative understanding of biofilm structure and composition is clearly possible by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) at least up to 192 h. Combining the data obtained from PNA FISH/CLSM with data from other established techniques and from calculated microbial parameters, we were able to develop a model for this tri-species biofilm. The higher growth rate and exopolymer production ability of E. coli probably led this microorganism to outcompete the other two [average cell numbers (cells/cm(2)) for 48 h biofilm: E. coli 2,1 × 10(8) (± 2,4 × 10(7)); L. monocytogenes 6,8 × 10(7) (± 9,4 × 10(6)); and S. enterica 1,4 × 10(6) (± 4,1 × 10(5))]. This overgrowth was confirmed by CSLM, with two well-defined layers being easily identified: the top one with E. coli, and the bottom one with mixed regions of L. monocytogenes and S. enterica. SIGNIFICANCE: While PNA FISH has been described previously for the qualitative study of biofilm populations, the present investigation demonstrates that it can also be used for the accurate quantification and spatial distribution of species in polymicrobial communities. Thus, it facilitates the understanding of interspecies interactions and how these are affected by changes in the surrounding environment.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiofilmsIndolesIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMicroscopy, FluorescencePeptide Nucleic AcidsReproducibility of ResultsSpecies SpecificityDAPIIndolesPeptide Nucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID21479268
PMCPMC3066202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.