Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21478901›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2011

Pathogenomics of Xanthomonas: understanding bacterium-plant interactions.

Robert P Ryan, Frank-Jörg Vorhölter, Neha Potnis, Jeffrey B Jones, Marie-Anne Van Sluys, Adam J Bogdanove, J Maxwell Dow

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 230 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
230citing papers in PubMed
39.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

230 citing papers in PubMed, 568 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  12. Dynamics of contaminant microbes in bioethanol production from sugarcane.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  13. Genomic characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Resistance gene againstFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparative genomics of 'Microbial genomics · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

170 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Robert P RyanBIOMERIT Research Centre, Department of Microbiology, BioSciences Institute, University College Cork, Ireland.
Frank-Jörg Vorhölter
Neha Potnis
Jeffrey B Jones
Marie-Anne Van Sluys
Adam J Bogdanove
J Maxwell Dow
University College Cork · IEBielefeld University · DEIowa State University · USUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Central Florida · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xanthomonas is a large genus of Gram-negative bacteria that cause disease in hundreds of plant hosts, including many economically important crops. Pathogenic species and pathovars within species show a high degree of host plant specificity and many exhibit tissue specificity, invading either the vascular system or the mesophyll tissue of the host. In this Review, we discuss the insights that functional and comparative genomic studies are providing into the adaptation of this group of bacteria to exploit the extraordinary diversity of plant hosts and different host tissues.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsGenome, BacterialGenomicsHost-Pathogen InteractionsPlant DiseasesVirulence FactorsXanthomonasBacterial ProteinsVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID21478901
OpenAlexW2064100312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.