ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2011
Genome-wide survey of natural selection on functional, structural, and network properties of polymorphic sites in Saccharomyces paradoxus.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicted protein 3D structures provide essential insights into the genetic architecture underlying phenotypic diversity in maize.Genome research · 2026Article
- Interspecific hybridization as a driver of fungal evolution and adaptation.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2021Review
- Population Size, Sex and Purifying Selection: Comparative Genomics of Two Sister Taxa of the Wild Yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Divergence of Peroxisome Membrane Gene Sequence and Expression Between Yeast Species.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Distal CpG islands can serve as alternative promoters to transcribe genes with silenced proximal promoters.Genome research · 2017Article
- New views on the selection acting on genetic polymorphism in central metabolic genes.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2017Review
- Essentiality Is a Strong Determinant of Protein Rates of Evolution during Mutation Accumulation Experiments in Escherichia coli.Genome biology and evolution · 2016Article
- Different evolutionary patterns of SNPs between domains and unassigned regions in human protein-coding sequences.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2016Article
- Estimating the Fitness Effects of New Mutations in the Wild Yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus.Genome biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Article
- A small system--high-resolution study of metabolic adaptation in the central metabolic pathway to temperate climates in Drosophila melanogaster.Molecular biology and evolution · 2014Article
- Strong purifying selection at synonymous sites in D. melanogaster.PLoS genetics · 2013Article
- Evolution of a membrane protein regulon in Saccharomyces.Molecular biology and evolution · 2012Article
- Genealogy-based methods for inference of historical recombination and gene flow and their application in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.PloS one · 2012Article
- Article
- Selection for translation efficiency on synonymous polymorphisms in recent human evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo characterize the genetic basis of phenotypic evolution, numerous studies have identified individual genes that have likely evolved under natural selection. However, phenotypic changes may represent the cumulative effect of similar evolutionary forces acting on functionally related groups of genes. Phylogenetic analyses of divergent yeast species have identified functional groups of genes that have evolved at significantly different rates, suggestive of differential selection on the functional properties. However, due to environmental heterogeneity over long evolutionary timescales, selection operating within a single lineage may be dramatically different, and it is not detectable via interspecific comparisons alone. Moreover, interspecific studies typically quantify selection on protein-coding regions using the D(n)/D(s) ratio, which cannot be extended easily to study selection on noncoding regions or synonymous sites. The population genetic-based analysis of selection operating within a single lineage ameliorates these limitations.
findingsWe investigated selection on several properties associated with genes, promoters, or polymorphic sites, by analyzing the derived allele frequency spectrum of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 28 strains of Saccharomyces paradoxus. We found evidence for significant differential selection between many functionally relevant categories of SNPs, underscoring the utility of function-centric approaches for discovering signatures of natural selection. When comparable, our findings are largely consistent with previous studies based on interspecific comparisons, with one notable exception: our study finds that mutations from an ancient amino acid to a relatively new amino acid are selectively disfavored, whereas interspecific comparisons have found selection against ancient amino acids. Several of our findings have not been addressed through prior interspecific studies: we find that synonymous mutations from preferred to unpreferred codons are selected against and that synonymous SNPs in the linker regions of proteins are relatively less constrained than those within protein domains.
conclusionsWe present the first global survey of selection acting on various functional properties in S. paradoxus. We found that selection pressures previously detected over long evolutionary timescales have also shaped the evolution of S. paradoxus. Importantly, we also make novel discoveries untenable via conventional interspecific analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.