Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21478308›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2011

Competing formate- and carbon dioxide-utilizing prokaryotes in an anoxic methane-emitting fen soil.

Sindy Hunger, Oliver Schmidt, Maik Hilgarth, Marcus A Horn, Steffen Kolb, Ralf Conrad, Harold L Drake

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The root zone of graminoids: A niche for HFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Draft Genome Sequence ofGenome announcements · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. How do Elevated COMicrobial ecology · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sindy HungerDepartment of Ecological Microbiology, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany.
Oliver Schmidt
Maik Hilgarth
Marcus A Horn
Steffen Kolb
Ralf Conrad
Harold L Drake
University of Bayreuth · DEMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methanogenesis in wetlands is dependent on intermediary substrates derived from the degradation of biopolymers. Formate is one such substrate and is stimulatory to methanogenesis and acetogenesis in anoxic microcosms of soil from the fen Schlöppnerbrunnen. Formate dissimilation also yields CO(2) as a potential secondary substrate. The objective of this study was to resolve potential differences between anaerobic formate- and CO(2)-utilizing prokaryotes of this fen by stable isotope probing. Anoxic soil microcosms were pulsed daily with low concentrations of [(13)C]formate or (13)CO(2) (i.e., [(13)C]bicarbonate). Taxa were evaluated by assessment of 16S rRNA genes, mcrA (encoding the alpha-subunit of methyl-coenzyme M reductase), and fhs (encoding formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase). Methanogens, acetogens, and formate-hydrogen lyase-containing taxa appeared to compete for formate. Genes affiliated with Methanocellaceae, Methanobacteriaceae, Acetobacteraceae, and Rhodospirillaceae were (13)C enriched (i.e., labeled) in [(13)C]formate treatments, whereas genes affiliated with Methanosarcinaceae, Conexibacteraceae, and Solirubrobacteraceae were labeled in (13)CO(2) treatments. [(13)C]acetate was enriched in [(13)C]formate treatments, but labeling of known acetogenic taxa was not detected. However, several phylotypes were affiliated with acetogen-containing taxa (e.g., Sporomusa). Methanosaetaceae-affiliated methanogens appeared to participate in the consumption of acetate. Twelve and 58 family-level archaeal and bacterial 16S rRNA phylotypes, respectively, were detected, approximately half of which had no isolated representatives. Crenarchaeota constituted half of the detected archaeal 16S rRNA phylotypes. The results highlight the unresolved microbial diversity of the fen Schlöppnerbrunnen, suggest that differing taxa competed for the same substrate, and indicate that Methanocellaceae, Methanobacteriaceae, Methanosarcinaceae, and Methanosaetaceae were linked to the production of methane, but they do not clearly resolve the taxa responsible for the apparent conversion of formate to acetate.

Indexed as

BiodiversitySoil MicrobiologyAnaerobiosisCarbon DioxideCarbon IsotopesCluster AnalysisDNA, ArchaealDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalFormatesGenes, rRNAMethaneMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRNA, ArchaealRNA, BacterialCarbon DioxideCarbon IsotopesDNA, ArchaealDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalFormatesformic acidMethaneRNA, ArchaealRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID21478308
PMCPMC3127604
OpenAlexW2109079594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.