Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21476672›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2011

Material parameter computation for multi-layered vocal fold models.

Bastian Schmidt, Michael Stingl, Günter Leugering, David A Berry, Michael Döllinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bastian SchmidtDepartment Mathematics, Applied Mathematics II, University of Erlangen, Martensstr 3, 91058 Erlangen, Germany. Bastian.Schmidt@am.uni-erlangen.de
Michael Stingl
Günter Leugering
David A Berry
Michael Döllinger

Funding

Quantitative Descriptions of Vocal Fold DynamicsR01DC003072 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BERRY, DAVID A · 2002 to 2011
$3.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003072NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC03072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, the prevention and treatment of voice disorders is an ever-increasing health concern. Since many occupations rely on verbal communication, vocal health is necessary just to maintain one's livelihood. Commonly applied models to study vocal fold vibrations and air flow distributions are self sustained physical models of the larynx composed of artificial silicone vocal folds. Choosing appropriate mechanical parameters for these vocal fold models while considering simplifications due to manufacturing restrictions is difficult but crucial for achieving realistic behavior. In the present work, a combination of experimental and numerical approaches to compute material parameters for synthetic vocal fold models is presented. The material parameters are derived from deformation behaviors of excised human larynges. The resulting deformations are used as reference displacements for a tracking functional to be optimized. Material optimization was applied to three-dimensional vocal fold models based on isotropic and transverse-isotropic material laws, considering both a layered model with homogeneous material properties on each layer and an inhomogeneous model. The best results exhibited a transversal-isotropic inhomogeneous (i.e., not producible) model. For the homogeneous model (three layers), the transversal-isotropic material parameters were also computed for each layer yielding deformations similar to the measured human vocal fold deformations.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPhoneticsAir MovementsHumansLaryngeal NeoplasmsSpeech DisordersVocal Cords

Identifiers

PMID21476672
PMCPMC3087394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.