Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21476119›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2011

Genetic testing and Parkinson disease: assessment of patient knowledge, attitudes, and interest.

Dana Clay Falcone, Elisabeth McCarty Wood, Sharon X Xie, Andrew Siderowf, Vivianna M Van Deerlin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Deciding on genetic testing for familial dementia: Perspectives of patients and families.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic Testing forMovement disorders clinical practice · 2023
    Article
  10. Genetic Testing in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Role of Genetic Testing for Parkinson's Disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2021
    Review
  14. Genetic Testing for Parkinson Disease: Are We Ready?Neurology. Clinical practice · 2021
    Review
  15. Experience in Genetic Counseling forMovement disorders clinical practice · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dana Clay FalconeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. cdana@mail.med.upenn.edu
Elisabeth McCarty Wood
Sharon X Xie
Andrew Siderowf
Vivianna M Van Deerlin
University of Pennsylvania · USInstitute for Neurodegenerative Disorders · USPennsylvania Hospital · US

Funding

UPenn ADCC Biomarker CoreP30AG010124 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI XIE, SHARON XIANGWEN · 1991 to 2020
$35.1M
Project IV: "Alpha-Synuclein Strains & Diverse Synucleinopathies"P50NS053488 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TROJANOWSKI, JOHN Q. · 2007 to 2017
$20.9M
Penn Center for ELSI Research in Emerging Genetic Technologies in Health CareP50HG004487 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PYERITZ, REED E · 2007 to 2012
$6.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG004487NIA NIH HHS AG-10124NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010124NINDS NIH HHS NS-053488NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS053488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most common genetic contributor to late-onset Parkinson disease (PD) is the LRRK2 gene. In order to effectively integrate LRRK2 genetic testing into clinical practice, a strategy tailored to the PD population must be developed. We assessed 168 individuals with PD for baseline knowledge of genetics, perceived risk, and interest and opinions regarding genetic counseling and testing. Most participants felt that they were familiar with general genetics terms but overall knowledge levels were low, with an average score of 55%. The majority of participants thought it was likely they inherited a PD gene (72%), believed genetic testing for PD would be useful (86%), and were interested in genetic testing (59%) and genetic counseling (56%). However, only a few participants had heard of any genetic tests for PD (29%) or LRRK2 (10%). There appears to be a significant level of interest in genetics and genetic testing within the PD population, but a considerable deficit in genetics knowledge and an over-estimation of risk. Genetic education and counseling tools to address these needs were developed to provide patients with the ability to make informed and knowledgeable genetic testing decisions.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleParkinson DiseasePatients

Identifiers

PMID21476119
PMCPMC3280083
OpenAlexW2021842029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.