Trial reportInternational journal of colorectal disease2011
Laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch-rectal muscle sheath anastomosis for the treatment of familial adenomatous polyposis.
Trial report in International journal of colorectal disease, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional and long-term outcomes of ileorectal versus ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted synchronous bowel anastomoses for synchronous colorectal cancer: initial clinical experience.Oncotarget · 2017Review
- Volvulus of an ileal pouch-rectal anastomosis after subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis: report of a case.Surgery today · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFamilial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a colorectal disease treated by proctocolectomy. While ileal pouch-anal anastomosis preserves the anus, defecation dysfunction and incontinence can occur. We herein report the results of an improved laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch-rectal muscle sheath anastomosis after total proctocolectomy which preserves anal function, and compare the results with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
methodsA total of 22 patients with FAP were randomized to receive either ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (n = 11) or ileal pouch-rectal muscle sheath anastomosis (n = 11) after total proctocolectomy. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospitalization and postoperative anal pressure, defecation frequency, and quality of life were recorded and compared between the two groups.
resultsAll patients completed a minimum follow-up of 1 year. At the 1 year after the surgery, the daytime defecation frequency was 4.64 ± 0.92 times/day in the ileal pouch-rectal muscle sheath anastomosis group and 6.55 ± 1.13 times/day in the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis group (P = 0.004). Resting anal pressure, maximum squeeze pressure, and average number of daytime defecations in the ileal pouch-rectal muscle sheath group were all better than in the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis group (all, P < 0.05)
conclusionsIleal pouch-rectal muscle sheath anastomosis is associated with better anal function than ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.