Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21475954›Full record

SynthesisStem cell reviews and reports2011

Stem cell tracking in human trials: a meta-regression.

Peter McColgan, Pankaj Sharma, Paul Bentley

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Stem Cell Tracing Through MR Molecular Imaging.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dynamic In Vivo SPECT Imaging of Neural Stem Cells Functionalized with Radiolabeled Nanoparticles for Tracking of Glioblastoma.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Detection of homing-in of stem cells labeled with technetium-99m hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime in infarcted myocardium after intracoronary injection.Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India · 2014
    Article
  17. Magnetic resonance imaging of transplanted stem cell fate in stroke.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2014
    Review
  18. In vivo tracking techniques for cellular regeneration, replacement, and redirection.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2012
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Stem cell therapy for the spinal cord.Stem cell research & therapy · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter McColganImperial College Cerebrovascular Research Unit, Imperial College Hospitals, Charing Cross Campus, Fulham Palace Rd, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom.
Pankaj Sharma
Paul Bentley

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential effectiveness of cell therapies is dependent upon homing of transplanted cells to relevant target organs. In this study we firstly characterise the range of methods employed in all human therapeutic-cell studies published to date investigated with cell-tracking. Secondly, we determine factors that predict target-organ cell uptake efficiency by meta-regression. Following a comprehensive literature search, we identified 19 relevant trials, representing 145 patients over the following 7 diseases: myocardial infarction; Chagasic cardiomyopathy; ischemic stroke; traumatic injury of brain or spinal cord; diabetes and cirrhosis. Cell-labelling strategies employed were: 18-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET, 111-indium-SPECT; 99-technetium-SPECT, and iron oxide-MRI. The following methodological parameters were extracted: label type; label dose; labelling efficiency; stability; cell dose; percentage labelled cells; disease type and chronicity; cell purity; cell type; and cell uptake efficiency. Meta-regression techniques were used to identify predictors of cell-labelling efficiency; viability and cell uptake efficiency. These analyses found that labelling efficiency is proportionate to cell dose, while cell viability is lowest with indium and long label incubation times. Uptake efficiency of cells is predicted by stem cell purity (positive association) and cell infusion number (negative association), although these two variables are themselves strongly negatively correlated between studies. In summary the methodological factors associated with enhanced therapeutic-cell homing from both our own analysis, and within-trial comparisons, are: acute (versus chronic) disease, selective stem cells (versus unselected cells), and intra-arterial (versus intravenous) delivery. However, future trials need to keep cell doses and imaging times constant so as to enable meaningful comparisons in uptake efficiency.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesCell SurvivalCell TrackingClinical Trials as TopicFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMyocardial InfarctionPositron-Emission TomographyRegression AnalysisStaining and LabelingStem CellsStem Cell TransplantationTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.