ReviewThe Korean journal of laboratory medicine2011
The path to clinical proteomics research: integration of proteomics, genomics, clinical laboratory and regulatory science.
Review in The Korean journal of laboratory medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing Proteogenomics to Advance Precision Oncology: From Melanoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Perspective.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Characterization of 53 Multiplexed Targeted Proteomics Assays for Verification Studies in Cancer Cell Lines.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Article
- Acquired Male Hypogonadism in the Post-Genomic Era-A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Mass spectrometry-based proteomics as an emerging tool in clinical laboratories.Clinical proteomics · 2023Review
- ExSTA: External Standard Addition Method for Accurate High-Throughput Quantitation in Targeted Proteomics Experiments.Proteomics. Clinical applications · 2018Article
- Nasopharyngeal Protein Biomarkers of Acute Respiratory Virus Infection.EBioMedicine · 2017Article
- Recent advances in mass spectrometry-based proteomics of gastric cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- ELISA in the multiplex era: potentials and pitfalls.Proteomics. Clinical applications · 2015Review
- Analytical validation considerations of multiplex mass-spectrometry-based proteomic platforms for measuring protein biomarkers.Journal of proteome research · 2014Review
- Proteomic profiling of serum from patients with tuberculosis.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2014Article
- Cluster and Principal Component Analysis of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) Tumor Proteome.Iranian journal of cancer prevention · 2014Article
- Plasmodium falciparum malaria: proteomic studies.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva · 2012Article
- Interlaboratory reproducibility of selective reaction monitoring assays using multiple upfront analyte enrichment strategies.Journal of proteome research · 2012Article
- Sequential in-office vitreous aspirates demonstrate vitreous matrix metalloproteinase 9 levels correlate with the amount of subretinal fluid in eyes with wet age-related macular degeneration.Molecular vision · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Better biomarkers are urgently needed to cancer detection, diagnosis, and prognosis. While the genomics community is making significant advances in understanding the molecular basis of disease, proteomics will delineate the functional units of a cell, proteins and their intricate interaction network and signaling pathways for the underlying disease. Great progress has been made to characterize thousands of proteins qualitatively and quantitatively in complex biological systems by utilizing multi-dimensional sample fractionation strategies, mass spectrometry and protein microarrays. Comparative/quantitative analysis of high-quality clinical biospecimen (e.g., tissue and biofluids) of human cancer proteome landscape has the potential to reveal protein/peptide biomarkers responsible for this disease by means of their altered levels of expression, post-translational modifications as well as different forms of protein variants. Despite technological advances in proteomics, major hurdles still exist in every step of the biomarker development pipeline. The National Cancer Institute's Clinical Proteomic Technologies for Cancer initiative (NCI-CPTC) has taken a critical step to close the gap between biomarker discovery and qualification by introducing a pre-clinical "verification" stage in the pipeline, partnering with clinical laboratory organizations to develop and implement common standards, and developing regulatory science documents with the US Food and Drug Administration to educate the proteomics community on analytical evaluation requirements for multiplex assays in order to ensure the safety and effectiveness of these tests for their intended use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.