Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21474695›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2011

Convective flow dominates aerosol delivery to the lung segments.

C Darquenne, C van Ertbruggen, G K Prisk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Measuring Anatomical Distributions of Ventilation and Aerosol Deposition with PET-CT.Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Aerosol deposition in health and disease.Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2012
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C DarquenneDivision of Physiology 0931, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0931, USA. cdarquenne@ucsd.edu
C van Ertbruggen
G K Prisk

Funding

Modeling of Aerosol Transport in Alveolated AirwaysR01ES011177 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DARQUENNE, CHANTAL · 2001 to 2009
$1.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES-011177NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES011177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most previous computational studies on aerosol transport in models of the central airways of the human lung have focused on deposition, rather than transport of particles through these airways to the subtended lung regions. Using a model of the bronchial tree extending from the trachea to the segmental bronchi (J Appl Physiol 98: 970-980, 2005), we predicted aerosol delivery to the lung segments. Transport of 0.5- to 10-μm-diameter particles was computed at various gravity levels (0-1.6 G) during steady inspiration (100-500 ml/s). For each condition, the normalized aerosol distribution among the lung segments was compared with the normalized flow distribution by calculating the ratio (R(i)) of the number of particles exiting each segmental bronchus i to the flow. When R(i) = 1, particle transport was directly proportional to segmental flow. Flow and particle characteristics were represented by the Stokes number (Stk) in the trachea. For Stk < 0.01, R(i) values were close to 1 and were unaffected by gravity. For Stk > 0.01, R(i) varied greatly among the different outlets (R(i) = 0.30-1.93 in normal gravity for 10-μm particles at 500 ml/s) and was affected by gravity and inertia. These data suggest that, for Stk < 0.01, ventilation defines the delivery of aerosol to lung segments and that the use of aerosol tracers is a valid technique to visualize ventilation in different parts of the lung. At higher Stokes numbers, inertia, but not gravitational sedimentation, is the second major factor affecting the transport of large particles in the lung.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, AnatomicPulmonary VentilationRheologyAdministration, InhalationAerosolsAnalysis of VarianceBronchiGravitationHumansParticle SizePharmaceutical PreparationsTime FactorsTracheaAerosolsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID21474695
PMCPMC3137542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.