Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21474574›Full record

Trial reportChest2011

Providing coaching and cotinine results to preteens to reduce their secondhand smoke exposure: a randomized trial.

Melbourne F Hovell, Dennis R Wahlgren, Sandy Liles, Jennifer A Jones, Suzanne C Hughes, Georg E Matt, Ming Ji, Christina N Lessov-Schlaggar, Gary E Swan, Dale Chatfield and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chest, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Smokers with children with asthma: Parental perceptions about prototype intervention messages focused on reducing child tobacco exposure and use.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2020
    Observational
  12. Exploring the barriers and incentive architecture for modifying smoke exposures among asthmatics.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Feasibility of Measuring Tobacco Smoke Air Pollution in Homes: Report from a Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Children's exposure to secondhand and thirdhand smoke carcinogens and toxicants in homes of hookah smokers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2014
    Article
  17. Complete home smoking bans and antitobacco contingencies: a natural experiment.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Pilot study results from a brief intervention to create smoke-free homes.Journal of environmental and public health · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Melbourne F HovellCenter for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA. Electronic address: mhovell@projects.sdsu.edu.
Dennis R WahlgrenCenter for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Sandy LilesCenter for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Jennifer A JonesCenter for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Suzanne C HughesCenter for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Georg E MattGraduate School of Public Health, Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Ming JiDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Christina N Lessov-SchlaggarDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Gary E SwanCenter for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA.
Dale ChatfieldDepartment of Chemistry, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
Ding DingCenter for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
San Diego State University · USSRI International · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Environmental Tobacco Smoke Reduction in PreteensR01HL066307 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HOVELL, MELBOURNE F · 2003 to 2007
$3.9M
Biometric and Measured Genetic Research on SmokingR01DA018019 · NIDA · SRI INTERNATIONAL · PI SWAN, GARY E · 2003 to 2007
$2.2M
Reward and Control Processing in Cigarette Smoking Usins fMRIK01DA027046 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LESSOV-SCHLAGGAR, CHRISTINA N · 2009 to 2014
$757k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL066307NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL066307NIDA NIH HHS DA018019NIDA NIH HHS DA027046NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA027046NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSecondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) poses health risks to children living with smokers. Most interventions to protect children from SHSe have coached adult smokers. This trial determined whether coaching and cotinine feedback provided to preteens can reduce their SHSe.

methodsTwo hundred one predominantly low-income families with a resident smoker and a child aged 8 to 13 years who was exposed to two or more cigarettes per day or had a urine cotinine concentration ≥ 2.0 ng/mL were randomized to control or SHSe reduction coaching groups. During eight in-home sessions over 5 months, coaches presented to the child graphic charts of cotinine assay results as performance feedback and provided differential praise and incentives for cotinine reductions. Generalized estimating equations were used to determine the differential change in SHSe over time by group.

resultsFor the baseline to posttest period, the coaching group had a greater decrease in both urine cotinine concentration (P = .039) and reported child SHSe in the number of cigarettes exposed per day (child report, P = .003; parent report, P = .078). For posttest to month 12 follow-up, no group or group by time differences were obtained, and both groups returned toward baseline.

conclusionsCoaching preteens can reduce their SHSe, although reductions may not be sustained without ongoing counseling, feedback, and incentives. Unlike interventions that coach adults to reduce child SHSe, programs that increase child avoidance of SHSe have the potential to reduce SHSe in all settings in which the child is exposed, without requiring a change in adult smoking behavior.

Indexed as

CounselingAdolescentChildCotinineEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth EducationHumansMaleMotivationTobacco Smoke PollutionCotinineTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID21474574
PMCPMC3168853
OpenAlexW2148679388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.