Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21474265›Full record

SynthesisPatient education and counseling2012

Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.

Betty Chewning, Carma L Bylund, Bupendra Shah, Neeraj K Arora, Jennifer A Gueguen, Gregory Makoul

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Patient education and counseling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 357 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
357citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02290223 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Patient Activation to Address Chronic Pain and Opioid Management in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2015 to 2017Enrolled376ConditionsChronic PainArmsBehavioral Based Treatment Model
NCT03266796 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Shared Decision Making in Physical Therapy: a Cross-sectional Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKlinik ValensRan2017 to 2018Enrolled30ConditionsShared Decision MakingArmsgoal setting process
NCT03350854 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

An Intervention to Improve Decision Role Concordance Amongst Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2016 to 2017Enrolled100ConditionsBreast CancerArmsPatient Preference in Treatment Decision Making
NCT03537352 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Shared Decision Making in Patients With Surgical or Non-Surgical Diseases in a General Hospital: A Pilot Study

TypeobservationalSponsorPsychiatric Hospital of AtticaRan2018 to 2018Enrolled120ConditionsSurgical Procedure, Unspecified, General Medical ConditionArmsAny appropriate surgical treatment, Any appropriate drug or non-drug treatment excluding surgery
NCT06980103 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Use of a Decision Aid to Resolve Uncertainty About Radioactive Iodine Treatment in Patients With Intermediate Risk Thyroid Cancer: The Radiance Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorgetown UniversityRan2025 to 2029Enrolled408ConditionsThyroid CancerArmsDecision Aid, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

357 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Enhancing shared and surrogate decision making for people living with dementia: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Potential Adverse Outcomes of Shared Decision Making about Palliative Cancer Treatment: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. The impact of a physician's recommendation and gender on informed decision making: A randomized controlled study in a simulated decision situation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Prioritisation of treatment goals among older patients with non-curable cancer: the OPTion randomised controlled trial in Dutch primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Observational

297 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Betty ChewningSonderegger Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Pharmacy, Madison, WI 53705-2222, USA. bachewning@pharmacy.wisc.edu
Carma L Bylund
Bupendra Shah
Neeraj K Arora
Jennifer A Gueguen
Gregory Makoul

Funding

Older Adults &Drug Decisions: Collaboration &OutcomesR01AG018362 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI CHEWNING, BETTY ANN · 2002 to 2005
$2.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG018362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEmpirical literature on patient decision role preferences regarding treatment and screening was reviewed to summarize patients' role preferences across measures, time and patient population.

methodsFive databases were searched from January 1980 to December 2007 (1980-2007 Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsychInfo, Web of Science and PubMed (2005-2007)). Eligible studies measured patient decision role preferences, described measures, presented findings as percentages or mean scores and were published in English from any country. Studies were compared by patient population, time of publication, and measure.

results115 studies were eligible. The majority of patients preferred sharing decisions with physicians in 63% of the studies. A time trend appeared. The majority of respondents preferred sharing decision roles in 71% of the studies from 2000 and later, compared to 50% of studies before 2000. Measures themselves, in addition to patient population, influenced the preferred decision roles reported.

conclusionFindings appear to vary with the measure of preferred decision making used, time of the publication and characteristics of the population. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The role preference measure itself must be considered when interpreting patient responses to a measure or question about a patient's preference for decision roles.

Indexed as

CommunicationDecision MakingPatient SatisfactionPersonal AutonomyPhysician-Patient RelationsChronic DiseaseHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumans

Identifiers

PMID21474265
PMCPMC4530615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.