ArticleAmerican heart journal2011
Projected impact of polypill use among US adults: Medication use, cardiovascular risk reduction, and side effects.
Article in American heart journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Polypill eligibility and equivalent intake in a Swiss population-based study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Electrocardiogram machine learning for detection of cardiovascular disease in African Americans: the Jackson Heart Study.European heart journal. Digital health · 2021Article
- Polypills for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2019Review
- From rapalogs to anti-aging formula.Oncotarget · 2017Review
- Article
- Top 10 cardiovascular therapies and interventions for the next decade.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2014Review
- Polypill therapy, subclinical atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular events-implications for the use of preventive pharmacotherapy: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2014Article
- Clinical utility of a novel coronary heart disease risk-assessment test to further classify intermediate-risk patients.Clinical cardiology · 2013Article
- Assessing patterns of use of cardio-protective polypill component medicines in Australian women.Drugs & aging · 2013Article
- Single-pill combinations: a therapeutic option or necessity for vascular risk treatment?Journal of drug assessment · 2013Article
- Comparative cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve medication adherence after myocardial infarction.Health services research · 2012Article
- Cardiovascular defense challenges at the basic, clinical, and population levels.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPolypills, which include multiple medications for reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in a single pill, have been proposed for population-wide use. The number of US adults eligible for polypills and potential benefits are unknown.
methodsThe National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2004 and 2007-2008 were analyzed to estimate treatment rates for medications proposed for inclusion in polypills (aspirin, statin, an angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor, and a thiazide-type diuretic for those without and a β-blocker for those with a history of myocardial infarction) among US adults. The number of coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke events potentially prevented through polypill use was projected by published meta-analyses and 3 large population-based cohort studies. Two polypill eligibility criteria were analyzed: (1) US adults ≥55 years and (2) US adults with a history of CVD.
resultsThere are 67.6 million US adults ≥55 years and 15.4 million US adults with a history of CVD and, thus, eligible for polypills using the 2 outlined criteria. In 2007 to 2008, 37.3% of US adults ≥55 years and 57.0% of those with a history of CVD were taking statins. Use of other polypill medications was also low. Polypill use by US adults aged ≥55 years is projected to potentially prevent 3.2 million CHD events and 1.7 million strokes over 10 years. Among those with a history of CVD, the potential to prevent of 0.9 million CHD events and 0.5 million strokes is projected.
conclusionsPolypills have the potential to lower CVD incidence substantially among US adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.