ArticleGenome biology2011
The role of chromatin accessibility in directing the widespread, overlapping patterns of Drosophila transcription factor binding.
Article in Genome biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
141 citing papers in PubMed, 240 citations in OpenAlex.
- Type 1 interferon perturbates clonal competition by reshaping human blood development.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Pioneer-factor activity requires stable chromatin occupancy mediated by both sequence-specific binding and disordered protein domains.Science advances · 2026Article
- Myocardial stunning: mechanisms, molecular insights, and gaps in knowledge.Bioscience reports · 2025Review
- HBMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Characterizing the regulatory logic of transcriptional control at the DNA sequence level by ensembles of thermodynamic models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Mechanisms driving functional divergence of transcription factor paralogs.The New phytologist · 2025Review
- Orchestration of Gut-Liver-Associated Transcription Factors in MAFLD: From Cross-Organ Interactions to Therapeutic Innovation.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Many transcription factor families have evolutionarily conserved binding motifs in plants.Plant physiology · 2025Article
- Genome access is transcription factor-specific and defined by nucleosome position.Molecular cell · 2024Article
- Deep learning the cis-regulatory code for gene expression in selected model plants.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Protein-intrinsic properties and context-dependent effects regulate pioneer factor binding and function.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024Article
- Epigenetic Regulation of Ameloblast Differentiation by HMGN Proteins.Journal of dental research · 2024Article
- The evolution and mutational robustness of chromatin accessibility in Drosophila.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Localization of the Drosophila pioneer factor GAF to subnuclear foci is driven by DNA binding and required to silence satellite repeat expression.Developmental cell · 2023Article
- Decoding enhancer complexity with machine learning and high-throughput discovery.Genome biology · 2023Review
- Protein-intrinsic properties and context-dependent effects regulate pioneer-factor binding and function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Generating specificity in genome regulation through transcription factor sensitivity to chromatin.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022Review
- Review
- Profiling the quantitative occupancy of myriad transcription factors across conditions by modeling chromatin accessibility data.Genome research · 2022Article
- Article
81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn Drosophila embryos, many biochemically and functionally unrelated transcription factors bind quantitatively to highly overlapping sets of genomic regions, with much of the lowest levels of binding being incidental, non-functional interactions on DNA. The primary biochemical mechanisms that drive these genome-wide occupancy patterns have yet to be established.
resultsHere we use data resulting from the DNaseI digestion of isolated embryo nuclei to provide a biophysical measure of the degree to which proteins can access different regions of the genome. We show that the in vivo binding patterns of 21 developmental regulators are quantitatively correlated with DNA accessibility in chromatin. Furthermore, we find that levels of factor occupancy in vivo correlate much more with the degree of chromatin accessibility than with occupancy predicted from in vitro affinity measurements using purified protein and naked DNA. Within accessible regions, however, the intrinsic affinity of the factor for DNA does play a role in determining net occupancy, with even weak affinity recognition sites contributing. Finally, we show that programmed changes in chromatin accessibility between different developmental stages correlate with quantitative alterations in factor binding.
conclusionsBased on these and other results, we propose a general mechanism to explain the widespread, overlapping DNA binding by animal transcription factors. In this view, transcription factors are expressed at sufficiently high concentrations in cells such that they can occupy their recognition sequences in highly accessible chromatin without the aid of physical cooperative interactions with other proteins, leading to highly overlapping, graded binding of unrelated factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.