Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21473766›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2011

The role of chromatin accessibility in directing the widespread, overlapping patterns of Drosophila transcription factor binding.

Xiao-Yong Li, Sean Thomas, Peter J Sabo, Michael B Eisen, John A Stamatoyannopoulos, Mark D Biggin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 240 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. HBMC bioinformatics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiao-Yong LiGenomics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road MS 84-171, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Sean Thomas
Peter J Sabo
Michael B Eisen
John A Stamatoyannopoulos
Mark D Biggin
University of Washington · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Transcription Network Controlling Drosophila DevelopmentR01GM070444 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI BIGGIN, MARK D · 2003 to 2007
$14.9M
Computational discovery of cis-regulatory sequencesR01GM071923 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STAMATOYANNOPOULOS, JOHN A · 2004 to 2007
$2.2M
UW/FHCRC TRAINING IN HEMOGLOBINPATHIES, GENOMICS AND PROTEOMICST90HG004007 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STAMATOYANNOPOULOS, GEORGE · 2006 to 2010
$327k
NHGRI NIH HHS T90 HG 004007-04NIGMS NIH HHS GM704403NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070444NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM71923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Drosophila embryos, many biochemically and functionally unrelated transcription factors bind quantitatively to highly overlapping sets of genomic regions, with much of the lowest levels of binding being incidental, non-functional interactions on DNA. The primary biochemical mechanisms that drive these genome-wide occupancy patterns have yet to be established.

resultsHere we use data resulting from the DNaseI digestion of isolated embryo nuclei to provide a biophysical measure of the degree to which proteins can access different regions of the genome. We show that the in vivo binding patterns of 21 developmental regulators are quantitatively correlated with DNA accessibility in chromatin. Furthermore, we find that levels of factor occupancy in vivo correlate much more with the degree of chromatin accessibility than with occupancy predicted from in vitro affinity measurements using purified protein and naked DNA. Within accessible regions, however, the intrinsic affinity of the factor for DNA does play a role in determining net occupancy, with even weak affinity recognition sites contributing. Finally, we show that programmed changes in chromatin accessibility between different developmental stages correlate with quantitative alterations in factor binding.

conclusionsBased on these and other results, we propose a general mechanism to explain the widespread, overlapping DNA binding by animal transcription factors. In this view, transcription factors are expressed at sufficiently high concentrations in cells such that they can occupy their recognition sequences in highly accessible chromatin without the aid of physical cooperative interactions with other proteins, leading to highly overlapping, graded binding of unrelated factors.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceBinding SitesCell NucleusChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationComputational BiologyDeoxyribonuclease IDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterGenome, InsectModels, GeneticProtein BindingTranscription FactorsChromatinDeoxyribonuclease IDNADNA-Binding ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21473766
PMCPMC3218860
OpenAlexW2155718935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.