Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21473572›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2011

Higher sensitivity dopamine measurements with faster-scan cyclic voltammetry.

Richard B Keithley, Pavel Takmakov, Elizabeth S Bucher, Anna M Belle, Catarina A Owesson-White, Jinwoo Park, R Mark Wightman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 179 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Quantitative Control of ZnAnalytical chemistry · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Waveform Optimization for theACS measurement science au · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard B KeithleyDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599, United States.
Pavel Takmakov
Elizabeth S Bucher
Anna M Belle
Catarina A Owesson-White
Jinwoo Park
R Mark Wightman
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

DYNAMICS OF IN VIVO DOPAMINE RELEASER01DA010900 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WIGHTMAN, ROBERT MARK · 1997 to 2017
$5.1M
NIDA NIH HHS DA 10900NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA010900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV) with carbon-fiber microelectrodes has been successfully used to detect catecholamine release in vivo. Generally, waveforms with anodic voltage limits of 1.0 or 1.3 V (vs Ag/AgCl) are used for detection. The 1.0 V excursion provides good temporal resolution but suffers from a lack of sensitivity. The 1.3 V excursion increases sensitivity but also increases response time, which can blur the detection of neurochemical events. Here, the scan rate was increased to improve the sensitivity of the 1.0 V excursion while maintaining the rapid temporal response. However, increasing scan rate increases both the desired faradaic current response and the already large charging current associated with the voltage sweep. Analog background subtraction was used to prevent the analog-to-digital converter from saturating from the high currents generated with increasing scan rate by neutralizing some of the charging current. In vitro results with the 1.0 V waveform showed approximately a 4-fold increase in signal-to-noise ratio with maintenance of the desired faster response time by increasing scan rate up to 2400 V/s. In vivo, stable stimulated release was detected with an approximate 4-fold increase in peak current. The scan rate of the 1.3 V waveform was also increased, but the signal was unstable with time in vitro and in vivo. Adapting the 1.3 V triangular wave into a sawhorse design prevented signal decay and increased the faradaic response. The use of the 1.3 V sawhorse waveform decreased the detection limit of dopamine with FSCV to 0.96 ± 0.08 nM in vitro and showed improved performance in vivo without affecting the neuronal environment. Electron microscopy showed dopamine sensitivity is in a quasi-steady state with carbon-fiber microelectrodes scanned to potentials above 1.0 V.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarbonCarbon FiberDopamineElectric ConductivityElectrochemistryMaleMicroelectrodesNeuronsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySurface PropertiesTime FactorsCarbonCarbon FiberDopamine

Identifiers

PMID21473572
PMCPMC3089759
OpenAlexW2020215984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.