ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
Tracking stem cells using magnetic nanoparticles.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
117 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 261 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutics with SPION-labeled stem cells for the main diseases related to brain aging: a systematic review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2014Pooled it
- Cell transplantation for spinal cord injury: a systematic review.BioMed research international · 2013Pooled it
- From Magnetic Moment to Magnetic Particle Imaging: A Comprehensive Review on MPI Technology, Tracer Design and Biological Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Novel non‑metal‑based contrast agents for MR imaging: Emerging approaches and clinical perspectives (Review).International journal of oncology · 2025Review
- Generation of a Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Line Expressing a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reporter Gene.Small methods · 2024Article
- Near-infrared-II fluorescence/magnetic resonance double modal imaging of transplanted stem cells using lanthanide co-doped gadolinium oxide nanoparticles.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2024Article
- Counting cells in motion by quantitative real-time magnetic particle imaging.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Application of magnetism in tissue regeneration: recent progress and future prospects.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Review
- Fluorescence-Based Mono- and Multimodal Imaging for In Vivo Tracking of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Formulation and Characterization of FePolymers · 2023Article
- Response of the Endogenous Antioxidant Defense System Induced in RAW 264.7 Macrophages upon Exposure to Dextran-Coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Overview of Antimicrobial Biodegradable Polyester-Based Formulations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Dual Magnetic Particle Imaging and Akaluc Bioluminescence Imaging for Tracking Cancer Cell Metastasis.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- In Vitro and In Vivo Biological Assays of Dextran Coated Iron Oxide Aqueous Magnetic Fluids.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- In Vivo Multimodal Imaging of Stem Cells Using Nanohybrid Particles Incorporating Quantum Dots and Magnetic Nanoparticles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Tracking Neural Stem Cells in vivo: Achievements and Limitations.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022Review
- Application of magnetic nanoparticles in cell therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Review
- Emerging scaffold- and cellular-based strategies for brain tissue regeneration and imaging.In vitro models · 2022Review
- Article
- Magnetic particles in motion: magneto-motive imaging and sensing.Theranostics · 2022Review
57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Stem cell therapies offer great promise for many diseases, especially those without current effective treatments. It is believed that noninvasive imaging techniques, which offer the ability to track the status of cells after transplantation, will expedite progress in this field and help to achieve maximized therapeutic effect. Today's biomedical imaging technology allows for real-time, noninvasive monitoring of grafted stem cells including their biodistribution, migration, survival, and differentiation, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of nanoparticle-labeled cells being one of the most commonly used techniques. Among the advantages of MR cell tracking are its high spatial resolution, no exposure to ionizing radiation, and clinical applicability. In order to track cells by MRI, the cells need to be labeled with magnetic nanoparticles, for which many types exist. There are several cellular labeling techniques available, including simple incubation, use of transfection agents, magnetoelectroporation, and magnetosonoporation. In this overview article, we will review the use of different magnetic nanoparticles and discuss how these particles can be used to track the distribution of transplanted cells in different organ systems. Caveats and limitations inherent to the tracking of nanoparticle-labeled stem cells are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.