Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21472495›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2011

A randomized controlled calendar mail-out to increase cancer screening among urban American Indian and Alaska Native patients.

Ardith Z Doorenbos, Clemma Jacobsen, Rebecca Corpuz, Ralph Forquera, Dedra Buchwald

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ardith Z DoorenbosSchool of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98177, USA. doorenbo@u.washington.edu
Clemma Jacobsen
Rebecca Corpuz
Ralph Forquera
Dedra Buchwald
University of Washington · USSeattle Indian Health Board · US

Funding

INSTITUTE FOR TRANSLATIONAL HEALTH SCIENCE (UL1): BPCAUL1RR025014 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2007 to 2011
$51.5M
Trauma Screening, brief intervention and referral among AI/AN adultsP60MD000507 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MANSON, SPERO MARTIN · 2003 to 2016
$16.1M
Research Education CoreP30AG015292 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MULLER, CLEMMA JACOBSEN · 1997 to 2022
$12.3M
Regional Native American Community Networks ProgramU01CA114642 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BUCHWALD, DEDRA S · 2005 to 2010
$4.6M
UNDERSTANDING &REDUCING NATIVE ELDER HEALTH DISPARITIESP01HS010854 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MANSON, SPERO M · 2000 to 2005
–
AHRQ HHS P01 HS010854AHRQ HHS P01 HS10854NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114642NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025014NIA NIH HHS P30 AG015292NIA NIH HHS P30 AG15297NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD000507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study seeks to ascertain whether a culturally tailored art calendar could improve participation in cancer screening activities. We conducted a randomized, controlled calendar mail-out in which a Native art calendar was sent by first class mail to 5,633 patients seen at an urban American Indian clinic during the prior 2 years. Using random assignment, half of the patients were mailed a "message" calendar with screening information and reminders on breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer; the other half received a calendar without messages. The receipt of cancer screening services was ascertained through chart abstraction in the following 15 months. In total, 5,363 observations (health messages n = 2,695; no messages n = 2,668) were analyzed. The calendar with health messages did not result in increased receipt of any cancer-related prevention outcome compared to the calendar without health messages. We solicited clinic input to create a culturally appropriate visual intervention to increase cancer screening in a vulnerable, underserved urban population. Our results suggest that printed materials with health messages are likely too weak an intervention to produce the desired behavioral outcomes in cancer screening.

Indexed as

Postal ServiceAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlaskaArtEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIndians, North AmericanMaleMiddle AgedMinority GroupsNeoplasmsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21472495
PMCPMC5547754
OpenAlexW2156425678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.