Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21472449›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2011

Effect of controlled inoculation with specific mycorrhizal fungi from the urban environment on growth and physiology of containerized shade tree species growing under different water regimes.

Alessio Fini, Piero Frangi, Gabriele Amoroso, Riccardo Piatti, Marco Faoro, Chandra Bellasio, Francesco Ferrini

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alessio FiniDepartment of Plant, Soil and Environmental Science, University of Florence, viale delle Idee 30, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy. alessio.fini@unifi.it.
Piero FrangiCentro MiRT, Fondazione Minoprio, viale Raimondi 54, 22070, Vertemate con Minoprio (CO), Italy.
Gabriele AmorosoCentro MiRT, Fondazione Minoprio, viale Raimondi 54, 22070, Vertemate con Minoprio (CO), Italy.
Riccardo PiattiCentro MiRT, Fondazione Minoprio, viale Raimondi 54, 22070, Vertemate con Minoprio (CO), Italy.
Marco FaoroCentro MiRT, Fondazione Minoprio, viale Raimondi 54, 22070, Vertemate con Minoprio (CO), Italy.
Chandra BellasioDepartment of Plant, Soil and Environmental Science, University of Florence, viale delle Idee 30, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy.
Francesco FerriniDepartment of Plant, Soil and Environmental Science, University of Florence, viale delle Idee 30, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy.
University of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this work was to evaluate the effects of selected mycorrhiza obtained in the urban environment on growth, leaf gas exchange, and drought tolerance of containerized plants growing in the nursery. Two-year-old uniform Acer campestre L., Tilia cordata Mill., and Quercus robur L. were inoculated with a mixture of infected roots and mycelium of selected arbuscular (maple, linden) and/or ectomycorrhiza (linden, oak) fungi and grown in well-watered or water shortage conditions. Plant biomass and leaf area were measured 1 and 2 years after inoculation. Leaf gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and water relations were measured during the first and second growing seasons after inoculation. Our data suggest that the mycelium-based inoculum used in this experiment was able to colonize the roots of the tree species growing in the nursery. Plant biomass was affected by water shortage, but not by inoculation. Leaf area was affected by water regime and, in oak and linden, by inoculation. Leaf gas exchange was affected by inoculation and water stress. V(cmax) and J(max) were increased by inoculation and decreased by water shortage in all species. F(v)/F(m) was also generally higher in inoculated plants than in control. Changes in PSII photochemistry and photosynthesis may be related to the capacity of inoculated plants to maintain less negative leaf water potential under drought conditions. The overall data suggest that inoculated plants were better able to maintain physiological activity during water stress in comparison to non-inoculated plants.

Indexed as

AcerAgricultural InoculantsChlorophyllCity PlanningForestryFungiMycorrhizaePhotosynthesisQuercusTiliaTreesWaterChlorophyllWater

Identifiers

PMID21472449
OpenAlexW2061651508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.