Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21470506›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2011

High resolution analysis of wait times and factors affecting surgical expediency.

Eric Cole, Wilma Hopman, Jun Kawakami

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07552961 (Evaluating the Feasibility of a Comprehensive Prehabilitation Program for Use in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07552961 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating the Feasibility of a Comprehensive Prehabilitation Program for Use in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Outflow ObstructionArmsComprehensive Prehabilitation Programming
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric ColeUrology Resident, Department of Urology, McMaster University Hamilton ON.
Wilma Hopman
Jun Kawakami

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWait times in Canada are increasingly being monitored as an indicator of quality health care delivery. We created a higher resolution picture of the wait experienced by urological surgery patients beginning with the initial referral. In doing so, we hoped to (a) identify potential bottlenecks and common delays at our centre, and (b) identify predictors of wait time.

methodsThe charts of 322 patients undergoing surgery from November 2007 to March 2008 were reviewed and specific dates, patient factors and delays were recorded. The data were used to detail the patient's wait and to determine the patient factors which were predictive of wait time.

resultsThe mean time from decision to operate to the day of operation was 75.87 days for all patients. This number accounts for 53% of the wait time, while the time from referral to decision to operate is 47%. Predictors of a decreased wait time include cancer cases, younger age, urgency score, repeat patients and female gender in multivariate analysis. Delays were experienced by 16.8% of patients; most common delays were operating room cancellations/time constraints, patients requiring further optimization and delays in referral (4.7%, 3.4% and 3.1%, respectively).

conclusionsThe waiting process is complex; the actual waiting time that a patient must endure is much longer than the wait times traditionally recorded and reported by hospitals. As strategies are implemented to decrease wait times, it will become increasingly important to monitor the entire wait time from referral to operation and to ensure that changes are being made that truly decrease wait times and not simply shift where and when the patient waits.

Identifiers

PMID21470506
PMCPMC3036749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.