Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21470200›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2011

Identification and development of specific inhibitors for insulin-regulated aminopeptidase as a new class of cognitive enhancers.

Anthony L Albiston, Shanti Diwakarla, Ruani N Fernando, Simon J Mountford, Holly R Yeatman, Broden Morgan, Vi Pham, Jessica K Holien, Michael W Parker, Philip E Thompson and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Renin Angiotensin System as a Therapeutic Target in Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anthony L AlbistonHoward Florey Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Shanti Diwakarla
Ruani N Fernando
Simon J Mountford
Holly R Yeatman
Broden Morgan
Vi Pham
Jessica K Holien
Michael W Parker
Philip E Thompson
Siew Yeen Chai

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two structurally distinct peptides, angiotensin IV and LVV-haemorphin 7, both competitive high-affinity inhibitors of insulin-regulated aminopeptidase (IRAP), were found to enhance aversion-associated and spatial memory in normal rats and to improve performance in a number of memory tasks in rat deficits models. These findings provide compelling support for the development of specific, high-affinity inhibitors of the enzyme as new cognitive enhancing agents. Different classes of IRAP inhibitors have been developed including peptidomimetics and small molecular weight compounds identified through in silico screening with a homology model of the catalytic domain of IRAP. The proof of principal that inhibition of IRAP activity results in facilitation of memory has been obtained by the demonstration that the small-molecule IRAP inhibitors also exhibit memory-enhancing properties.

Indexed as

AnimalsCognitionCystinyl AminopeptidaseEnzyme InhibitorsHumansNootropic AgentsCystinyl AminopeptidaseEnzyme Inhibitorsleucyl-cystinyl aminopeptidaseNootropic Agents

Identifiers

PMID21470200
PMCPMC3171858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.